Laissez-faire leadership, also known as delegative leadership, is a type of leadership style in which leaders are hands-off and allow group members to make the decisions.
This style should be used when
1. When team members have the skills to succeed. Laissez-faire leadership can be effective in situations where group members are highly skilled, motivated, and capable of working on their own. Since these group members are experts and have the knowledge and skills to work independently, they are capable of accomplishing tasks with very little guidance.
2. When group members are experts. The delegative style can be particularly effective in situations where group members are actually more knowledgeable than the group's leader. Because team members are the experts in a particular area, the laissez-faire style allows them to demonstrate their deep knowledge and skill surrounding that particular subject.
3. When independence is valued. This autonomy can be freeing to some group members and help them feel more satisfied with their work. The laissez-faire style can be used in situations where followers have a high-level of passion and intrinsic motivation for their work.
It is a true statement that the human infant shows a remarkable degree of learning power and complexity in what is being learned.
<h3>Who wrote the quoted word?</h3>
The quoted word <em>"human infant shows a remarkable degree of learning power and complexity in what is being learned"</em> is created by an cognitive psychologist called Jean Mandler.
In conclusion, it is true that the human infant shows a remarkable degree of learning power and complexity in what is being learned.
Read more about Jean Mandler
<em>brainly.com/question/6227451</em>
Answer:
I think they can change it or veto it. in other words if everyone isn't in favor of it it wont become a new law.
Explanation:
Answer:
This illustrates: <u>Overreliance on anecdotes.</u>
Explanation:
What Dr McDonald is using to validate and support his treatment for ADHD are mearly anecdotes, which are not sufficient enough in the scientific field. To justufy a practice or a treatment a professional should consider a theory that has been accurate and has prove of its results.
Overreliance on anecdotes means putting all the justification of the validity of a treatment, only over people´s testimony.
