Answer:
C) Unstable, undemocratic countries pose a danger to the entire world.
Explanation:
The statement that would be created by a follower of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is "Unstable, undemocratic nations profess a threat to the entire globe."
People that promote these sorts of wars and aggression think that violence is the means to reply to earlier aggression. Nations such as Middle East countries such as Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, are supposed to be a warning to the protection of the United States and its commercial and political concerns. That is why some people recommend attacks rather than diplomacy and meetings.
b. sending troops to attack American settlements
add me on snapchat- fuscofusco15
Hello,
1. Embargoes are trade barriers: True
2. b) Emmbargoes can increase economic succes of smaller countries.
Plz branliest
The term Jim Crow was widely used as a euphemism for black persons, from the color of the bird. The 1832 faux-minstrel song "Jump Jim Crow" (a white portrayal of a slave stereotype) was used to attack Andrew Jackson's populist policies.
So the laws that were enacted following the easing of Reconstruction were called Jim Crow laws. While they could not openly prevent economic activity by African-Americans, they established a legal system of second-class citizenship by requiring blacks to use separate-but-equal facilities (whose blatant inequality was often overlooked). Notable were "back of the bus" public transportation rules, and refusal by white restauants to serve blacks (Negros, colored) at the same lunch counters as whites.
Another sub-genre of Jim Crow laws outlawed interracial marriages (miscegenation). These were widely enacted in the North and South.
It was not until the period after World War 2, when the armed forces were finally integrated, that the move for civil rights gained impetus, culminating in violent clashes in the South as voter drives and demonstrations became more of a threat to the white hierarchy. The landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the beginning of the end for racial discrimination disguised as a legal public policy.
By lowering trade barriers....I think. Sorry if it's wrong
