Turkish cuisine inherited its ottoman heritage which Coolidge Ben described as a fusion bf refinement of Turkic and Persian cuisines.
Answer:
The correct option is A: Perform a strategic systems analysis
Explanation:
Strategic systems analysis provides an overall analysis aimed at providing your business with a lasting business advantage. It gives a firm the tool for survival and allows a firm or intending firm to understand what is needed for future success. This provides an alignment with IT and the business and information systems is effectively used to provide you with what other competitors are doing out there and the ways in which you can be competitive in the market. Hence, this is the first step required that needs to be done by the distributor if he wants to see the benefits of implementing new information systems.
Answer:
This statement is <u>TRUE</u>.
Explanation:
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) measures brain activity in blood flow. The blood flow concentrates or increases in the neural zone that is being used or activated.
This technique can be afected by certain factors such as noise from the scanner, also it can be afected by brain activity from sensations or thoughts. This is the reason why the subjects go through at least two different treatments in order to determine relative increases in the activation of each treatment.
I believe the answer is: Referent power
Referent power refers to the type of power that can be used to influence an outcome through the interpersonal relationship that an individual has with another. In order for a person to have a referent power, he/she must be genuinely liked or respected by the other person.
Answer:
<em>I can see that there are no choices.</em>
fallacy of bandwagon
Explanation:
A "logical fallacy" refers to the error of reasoning or logical gap that makes an argument invalid.
The situation above commits the fallacy of the bandwagon because the argument is being supported only according to a significant number of population. This is a fallacy because it doesn't necessarily mean all of the retired persons are unhappy about the level of Social Security assistance due to the opinion of 30 persons who agreed that they were unhappy. It becomes a "standalone justification" of the validity of an argument. We cannot judge the happiness or unhappiness of all retired persons according only to a group of 30 persons <em>(even though they were chosen from different parts of the country). </em>
So, this explains the answer.
