Political Thought manages the regularizing part of Political Science. In such manner, it shows the cutoff points to Political Science and permits us to comprehend what we know and what We don't. Political Thought helps us what inquiries to pose in Political Science.
The estimated illegal immigrants that came to the u. S. In 2022 were estimated to be about 11.35 million illegal immigrants.
<h3>How many legal immigrants enter US in 2022?</h3>
According to the estimate given, there were about 11.35 million, and this were those that doesn't follow the due process to move to the united state of America.
All these immigrants are usually after the greener pasture but were unable to secure the requirement to get across to united state which made them to follow illegal path.
Learn more about illegal immigrants here: brainly.com/question/14640138
#SPJ1
The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.
For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means
- There are two types of tortious interference
- Tortious interference with contract
- Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
- Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project
From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct
Learn more Tort interference from:
brainly.com/question/15058912
This Act, by prohibiting private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of trade and unfair trade practices, by preventing excessive concentration of economic power and by eliminating unreasonable restraint on production, sale, price, technology and the like, and all other unjust restriction of business. The economic role of competition is to discipline the various participants in economic life to provide their goods and services skillfully and cheaply.
Answer:
I believe that Carl Lee Hailey was sane, just that he was overcome by rage because of his daughter's abduction. Even though he was acquitted due to insanity, that was only due to his brother's attorney's quick thinking.
Explanation:
