1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ad-work [718]
3 years ago
12

A material breach does not discharge the nonbreaching party from his obligations under the contract. True False

Law
1 answer:
Vsevolod [243]3 years ago
8 0
The answer is False.
You might be interested in
A crowbar is found at a crime scene. The crowbar has the potential to contain the suspect's fingerprints and/or DNA on the handl
Basile [38]
B,c, and D i believe


7 0
3 years ago
Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly.
Firdavs [7]

Answer:

security guards

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Prisons are typically under whose control?
Olin [163]

Prisons are typically under the control of the state or federal government. In state or federal government also there are two sections namely Department of justice (DOJ), Bureau of prisons (BOP).

8 0
2 years ago
What is the difference between justification and excuse defense
aleksandrvk [35]

Answer:

The difference is that Justification is a social Defense and a Excuse Defense is a mental disorder or something physical wrong with them

Explanation:

Excuse defence is when the defendant admits to committing a criminal act but believes that he or she cannot be held responsible because there was no criminal intent. Excuse defences that are used in courts today are; Age, Mental Disorder, Automatism, Mistake of Fact and Mistake of Law.

Justification is a defense in a criminal case, by which a defendant who committed the crime as defined, claims they did no wrong, because committing the crime advanced some social interest or vindicated a right of such importance that it outweighs the wrongfulness of the crime.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Attorney Sarah Robinson represents a woman named Taylor Jackson as a plaintiff in a car accident case. The defense has made an o
Dennis_Churaev [7]

Answer:

<u>Her actions were illegal</u>

Explanation:

We could make the conclusion that the attorney's actions were illegal. Consider, under the requirements of the law, an attorney acts as a representative to clients by giving advice to the clients, etc.

But they do not have the responsibility of making decisions for their clients <em>except</em> they receive the consent of their clients.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is the only program that covers nursing home care?
    11·2 answers
  • What was the name of the case when puyallup city council attempted renovations on shaw road in 2016?
    5·2 answers
  • The government provides a number of public safety services like
    9·2 answers
  • What is the next step after Congress proposes and approves an amendment
    6·1 answer
  • A homeowner filed a federal diversity action against the manufacturer of a pressure cooker for a products liability action based
    14·1 answer
  • Por que los derechos humanos son imprescriptibles​
    9·1 answer
  • Hows ur day??????????????????????????????????
    5·2 answers
  • Who is the current chief justice of the united states supreme court?.
    5·1 answer
  • 8.)
    5·1 answer
  • IM ACTUALLY BEGGIN PLEASE HELP ME ITS DUE SOON&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Evaluate the responsiveness of the
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!