In 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was passed in response to the Enron and WorldCom scandals, offering broad protections for whistleblowers at public companies in order to encourage fraud reporting. Private companies were considered immune to the law.
But in 2014 the Supreme Court heard a challenge to SOX, and ruled that even though the plaintiffs were not employees of the publicly traded company, the SOX whistleblower statute applied to them. The reason? They suffered retaliation for reporting alleged fraud involving financial reporting of a publicly-traded company.
Here’s what the law now says:
SOX covers employees of a public company’s private contractors and subcontractors.
SOX covers privately-owned companies if they provide services for publicly-traded ones. Answer:
Explanation:
The defense attorney delivers the impact statement
Group of answer choices.
a. Warning by the human resources department.
b. No consequences.
c. Loss of administrative credential.
d. An angry parent.
Answer:
a. Warning by the human resources department.
Explanation:
Human resources (HR) can be defined as an art of managing, controlling and improving the number of people (employees or workers), functions, activities which are being used effectively and efficiently by an organization.
Hence, human resources managers are saddled with the responsibility of managing and improving the welfare and working conditions of the employees working in an organization.
A possible consequence for failing to investigate a report of unprofessional conduct by a school employee would be to receive a warning by the human resources department.
If an employee working in an organization such as a school is found to act in an unprofessional manner towards a colleague, pupil or a parent, it is expected that the human resources department calls such a person to order through a query, warning in order to serve as a deterrent to others and to avoid a repeat of such behavior in the future.
Answer:
c. $37,200
Explanation:
I suppose this is the complete question:
You must chooce one of the amounts below.
Frank legally divorced his wife last year. His ex-wife has joint ownership of their home and sole custody of their two children. As part of the divorce decree (dated June 1, 2018), Frank was ordered to continue to pay the full mortgage payments as well as cash payments to his ex-wife. Frank was also ordered to pay child support for the children. Frank pays the following amounts: • Alimony in the amount of $1,300 cash per month • Mortgage payments in the amount of $1,800 per month • Child support in the amount of $800 per month How much can Frank deduct as alimony? Select one: a. $26,400 b. $46,800 c. $37,200 d. $36,000?
