Answer:
true it is factor of quality of life
Answer:
You should recommend the applicant, but qualify your recommendation by pointing out that you think he may have exaggerated some details on his resume
Explanation:
Engineers are ethically obligated to prevent the misrepresentation of their associate's qualifications. You must make your employer aware of the incorrect facts on the resume. On the other hand, if you really believe that the applicant would make a good employee, you should make that recommendation as well. Unless you are making the hiring decision, ethics requires only that you be truthful. If you believe the applicant has merit, you should state so. It is the company's decision to remove or not remove the applicant from consideration because of this transgression.
Answer:
I assume my self to be a part of the ancient Harappan civilization.
Explanation:
One of the most ancient civilizations in the world was at its peak from 3500 bc to 2500 B.C. Though ancient it had many modern features like the specialisation of work, complex division in society, and flourished trade and commerce. It had contacts with many distant civilizations like Mesopotamia, etc. To be a trader in that period reflects a chance of adventurous profession. Traveling distant land would have surely attracted me in the ancient phase.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. is difficult to implement because it is hard to tell how one decision will impact a large number of people
Explanation:
Utilitarianism refers to an ethical theory that states that the only right action is any action that leads to an increase happiness, and that any other action that leads to the opposite is wrong. Created by English philosopher Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832), he thought that seeking happiness and pleasure were the ultimate goal of human life, and his utilitarianism sought to create a moral theory that could also serve as a guide to action.
As good as it sounds, utilitarianism comes with a number of problems, however. It's not easy to implement, because defining an universal standard of happiness it's extremely hard: what's happy for some, might be hurting others. Often times, achieving happiness it's a zero-sum game (someone wins at the expense of someone else). Also, <u>utilitarianism is difficult to implement because it is hard to tell how one decision will impact a large number of people:</u> Either you have very limited information about the scope of your decision, which leads you to take uninformed decisions, or you have way too much information, which leads you to not being able to follow utilitarian principles because you realize how increasing happiness on one side means decreasing it on another one.
