Answer:
1. Which system would you prefer: one with many groups or one with few?
Pluralism is one of the values that democracies should aspire too, and pluralism means that many different interest groups in society are represented, so the first one is preferable.
Is free competition among competing interests actually the best way to promote the common good? Is such free competition typical in the United States today?
Free competition tends to be an effective way to promote the common good, the market system, which is better at producing wealth than planned economies, can prove this.
However, cooperation is also important and necessary, so the best way to promote the common good is a healthy balance between competition and cooperation.
Such free competition is relatively common in the United States, but some interest groups have more power than others, which limits competition. In these cases, the government must intervene to level the ground.
Answer:
I hope this helps
Explanation:
Classical pluralism is the view that politics and decision making are located mostly in the framework of government, but that many non-governmental groups use their resources to exert influence. The central question for classical pluralism is how power and influence are distributed in a political process.
That is known as <span>time space compression. </span>
Answer:
Companies act in immoral ways to drive profits. By hiring people from 3rd world countries, they have to follow less strict labor laws, minimum wage laws, etc. This is why child labor is so prevalent around poorer asian countries, because they have less strict laws and they can be paid pennies per hour.
Companies drive to act more ethically because it makes their public image look better, preventing boycotts and making customers want to "choose them" simply due to the fact that they are fair on the environment and their employees.
Explanation:
Common sense answer.
Supreme court justices are often active in the selection of new justices, advising the president as to whom he should pick.
name and explain both. potential positive benefits and a potential negative results o allowing the justices to influence the presidents choice.
