Each relates an anecdote to appeal to the reader's emotions.
Explanation:
In both of these examples, the author relates an anecdote. In the first case, the author tells us the story of a colleague of his who believed that his work was too "Hispanic" to be taken seriously. He modified it by taking out Spanish words and street talk. The second passage tells the story of an American who feels lonely without a heritage. In both of these examples, the authors try to appeal to the reader by telling emotional stories that reflect the intricacies of cultural representation in the United States.
I'm a part of the Welcoming Committee and Moderation Team here on Brainly. Thank you for posting your first question, and welcome to the community! If you have any questions, don't hesitate to reach out to me via messages!
Explanation:
Each author uses non-English words and figurative language.
The authors uses the words tortillas, pachucos, Oom-pah, and Gorditas. These are non-English words. They also use figurative language. When he says took the "tortillas out of his poetry", he is talking about how he is removing evidence of his Hispanic culture from his poetry. He thinks it will give him a better chance. In the second passage they are talking about overhearing someone who seems to wish for a heritage, not realizing that America has a heritage. The sensory detail of the American trees da
A statement by the ancient Greek philosopher Protagoras. It is usually interpreted to mean that the individual human being, rather than a god or an unchanging moral law, is the ultimate source of value
1. No, we do not want to risk our children's life or future, they are worth more than money. We would rather have love and support instead of being a greedy douch e.
2. Many people have different opinions, not all are right. Some may choose money over family and that's evil.
