Answer:
The person is NOT spending her income for both goods in a manner that maximizes her satisfaction.
Explanation:
Based on the information given The person is NOT spending her income for both goods in a manner that maximizes her satisfaction which means that she would have to INCREASE baseball games consumption and DECREASE movies consumption reason been that we were told that an individual enjoys going to baseball game three times compare to seeing new movie which therefore means The price of the ticket for a baseball game which is the amount of $30 should be increase while the price of a ticket for a movie which is the amount of $15 should be decrease.
Answer:
The reconciled balance is 7,294.14
Explanation:
bank statement 3,881.14
deposit in transit 9,555.88
oustanding check<u> (6,142.88) </u>
bank statment 7.294,14
From the bank accout we deduct the outstanding check and increase by the deposit in transit.
accounting 922.55
interst 77
service charge (38.22)
note collected 6,815.00
check <u> (482. 19) </u>
accounting 7.294,14
From the accounting we adjust for the transaciton which aren't know by the company:
the interest and service charge, the note colected and we also adjsut for mistake like the check not deducted.
in both we must reach the same final answer.
Answer:
the possible income from producing an additional item.
Explanation:
hope this helps if not let me know
Answer:
he opened a car company for a better tommorow
To answer the question above as to Jean's explanation on Say's Law or The Law of Market.. I agree that "if there is a surplus of goods, there must be unmet of demand for others". Jean's explanation is more of a Capitalist style of management.
