Answer:
I believe the answer is B.
If you have any more questions, Please watch a channel called "OverSimplified" they make great videos on this type of subject
Answer: Its the first one : Germany attacked nonmilitary ships and those of the United States, a country not involved in the war
Explanation:
Here are two truths about the Kellogg-Briand Pact.
1. It wanted to outlaw war, so that nothing like The Great War would ever happen again.
2. It failed to have any real impact in keeping nations from pursuing war, and we now call "The Great War" World War I, because it was followed by World War II.
French Minister of Foreign Affairs Aristide Briand and US Secretary of State Frank B. Kellogg were key proponents of the plan, which was signed by various dignitaries at the White House in 1928. The pact stated that the signing nations were "persuaded that the time has come when a frank renunciation of war as an instrument of national policy should be made," and so the signers of the treaty declared their opposition to war. By their example they hoped to encourage other nations of the world to join them in the same commitment.
The pact had little effect.
The naval battle of Trafalgar was fought on October 21, 1805. The British fleet under Lord Nelson met a combined fleet of French and Spanish ships off the coast of Spain. The English fleet won a tremendous victory ensuring that Napolean would not be able to invade Britain. Admiral Lord Nelson died during the battle.
Answer:
Finding a permanent solution to ruined harvest and mass famines
Explanation:
What Egypt could have done differently to save itself from decline is "finding a permanent solution to ruined harvest and mass famines."
This is because the major reason that is attributed to the fall of the Egyptian Empire are the following:
1. Great disparity in wealth between the aristocrats and the lower class
2. Constant war from neigboring city states
3. Culture and religion from other states.
Hence, to solve these issues, is to have a stable economy that is sustainable. And to have a sustainable economy is to ensure the city state or nation can feed itself well all the times, regardless of the climate change.
However, ancient Egypt struggled to maintain their economic growth which rest mainly on agriculture due to change in climate that effect their agricultural produce.
Therefore, in this case, the correct answer is "finding a permanent solution to ruined harvest and mass famines."
