1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Free_Kalibri [48]
3 years ago
8

Why were Japan and Italy unhappy with the results of peace after WWI?

History
2 answers:
Alexxandr [17]3 years ago
8 0
They always had war with each other
fomenos3 years ago
5 0
Japan were not so much unhappy with the outcome of the treaty of Versailles as with how the treaty negotiations took place. 

They felt probably correctly that they had been sidelined by the four major powers. However it should be noted that Japan didn't have any role in the European theatre of the war and its contribution was largely confined to providing convoy escorts and attacking Imperial Germany's possessions in the pacific. 

For minimal effort during the war Japan was given what had been Germanys pacific Islands together with former territories in China. 

The last part was hugely controversial the Germans had seized Shandong from the Chinese and the allies rather than return it to China gave it to Japan. 

The Americans as well as some other allies used the venue of Versailles to make criticisms of the rather brutal way that Japan chose to run its empire. At this stage Japan controlled Korea chunks of China as well as various other smaller territories. 

The Japanese never attempted to disguise the fact that they viewed other asians as racially inferior. The racial equality motion was merely an attempt to draw equivalence between their empire and the British and French empires. 

<span>So at the time the Japanese weren't particuarly displeased at the versailles treaty. In later years it would become tied with the hated Washington naval agreements signed in 1921 which would lead to massive unrest in the Japanese military.</span>
You might be interested in
What were two main compromises of the constitutional convention and how did it effect the government?
Irina-Kira [14]

Answer:

  • The Great Compromise (also known as the Connecticut Compromise)
  • The Three-Fifths Compromise

The two compromises affected the way a state's representation in Congress would be determined.

Explanation:

Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.  

The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states.  The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size.  The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation.  The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature.  Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population.  In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery.  For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures.  (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.)   The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.

7 0
3 years ago
How does the Constitution make people the main source of power
Hoochie [10]

"WE THE PEOPLE" Popular sovereignty or the authority of the people referenced in the Preamble of the Constitution - This principle states that government power comes from the consent of the governed (the citizens). One is example of popular sovereignty is the election of representatives and senators in which the citizens hold the vote to elect the legislatures the citizens favor.

4 0
3 years ago
What does the term isolationism mean? Why did China choose this path? AND most importantly why does this policy always actually
quester [9]

Answer:

isolationism means cutting yourself off from the world and trying not get involved in politics or trade, China chose this path maybe because they thought it could help not involve with countries like America. (i said maybe i tried my best)

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
1.
Kitty [74]
C I would ask anyone for good advice on this
8 0
3 years ago
Famous medieval scholar of ancient Roman writers
Novay_Z [31]

Answer:

petrarch

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe the, "Underground Railroad". (Brainliest answer pick every 20 Minutes for now.)
    7·2 answers
  • A town plans to put a triangular garden in the town square. The base of the garden will be 9 m, and the height will be 16 m.
    11·1 answer
  • "An estimated 10 percent of the federal judicial branch is comprised of African Americans. Based on this figure, approximately h
    5·1 answer
  • How much were the soldiers in the continental army paid?
    12·1 answer
  • What directs us towards good
    13·1 answer
  • Why does Truman think the Taft Hartley act would harm American laborers and employers
    11·1 answer
  • What are the answers to these questions?:
    13·1 answer
  • What are the significant ideas, events, and people that lead to Confederation. Be sure to explain your choices.(canada)
    7·1 answer
  • Nativists wanted to do what in regards to immigrants?
    14·1 answer
  • Match each quote to the diverse group that would most likely say it or agree with it
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!