Yes.
Even though democracy in theory must be something almost completely free of influence, all the influence of the people who have more power in society is still great, and it increases as social inequality grows
In situations where the population is in favor of deconcentrating income and wealth, this will has not found support in the political arena. On the one hand, there are those who insist on denying the problem, stating that the growth of social inequality does not produce adverse effects for society; on the other, there are those who declare that nothing can be done about the matter, since the culprits would be the <u>“market forces”</u>, neutral and impersonal economic mechanisms.
The maps of South Asia explain motivations behind Bangladesh’s move for independence as it tells us the places the move arise from and reason for the agitation for independence.
<h3>How did Bangladesh get independence?</h3>
The Bangladesh’s move for independence was one that was done via violent work down by the Pakistan Army.
The move was said to be led by the Awami League leader Sheikh Mujibur Rahman who was said to have pronouced the East Pakistan's independence as the state of Bangladesh in the year 1971.
Learn more about independence from
brainly.com/question/9515546
#SPJ1
This literary device is an example of "foreshadowing" - an indication of how future events will be effected.
Answer:
They paid great deals of money- The process of all of that was called "mummification."
Many Americans oppose U.S. participation in World War II for a number of reasons:
1) Americans did not want to have anything to do with any more European Wars, as the US went back to isolationism after World War I.
2) Because of a mixed population, it was better to wait for a reason to declare war, as the population was divided in between the two sides.
hope this helps
