1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MaRussiya [10]
3 years ago
8

What is not a characteristic of money

Advanced Placement (AP)
1 answer:
Alex777 [14]3 years ago
6 0
Money is a substance that is acceptable as a medium of exchange for goods and services and can further be used to settle debt.

Money is well defined by its functions and characteristics.

You might be interested in
Which of the following components serves as both a cover for the bottom of the engine block and a reservoir for engine oil? A. F
IRISSAK [1]
I believe the answer is C. oil pan
Oil pan usually bolted on the bottom<span> of the crankcase (even though in most cases it's made to be detachable) to cover the bottom of engine block.
It is also molded on the bottom of the crankcase so it could be used as oil reservoir.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
What is one original criticism of kant you can think of? what is one reason to agree with kant?
Yuri [45]

An original criticism  is that Kantian ethics is said to be doomed to be nothing or empty and also rigidly same in terms of its prescriptions and it is one where the complaints cannot be seen as  true.

<h3>What is the good thing according to Kant?</h3>

We need to look into them on equal moral ground based on the will that is behind their actions.

The only thing that is good and one that is without qualification is said to be good will and that was what Kant says and this is what i agree with.

Hence, An original criticism  is that Kantian ethics is said to be doomed to be nothing or empty and also rigidly same in terms of its prescriptions and it is one where the complaints cannot be seen as  true.

Learn more about criticism  from

brainly.com/question/2947946

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
Describe the trend in judicial independence in the United Kingdom between 1990 and 2019. Explain a possible reason for this tren
WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

The main factors aimed at securing judicial independence

 

The previous section has briefly explained why judicial independence is important for maintaining judges' impartiality and the rule of law. This section now focuses on how judicial independence can be guaranteed in its fundamental aspects (external, internal, institutional and individual independence). Various mechanisms are possible, and a range of examples are provided to encourage debate and develop critical thinking.

Judicial independence is a multifaceted concept. There are different institutional, legal and operational arrangements that in abstracto are designed to ensure judicial independence, and they can work differently depending on the historical, political, legal and social context in which the judiciary operates. Therefore, there is not an ideal model of implementing judicial independence in the sense that one-size-fits-all. Judicial independence is - in more concrete terms - the result of a combination of different conditions, measures, checks and balances, that can vary from one country to another. Every country has to find its own balance.

In some countries, for example, judicial independence is basically secured through a self-governing body or council (composed mainly of judges) which is in charge of all the decisions concerning judges' recruitment/nomination, career, transfer and discipline. This occurs, for example, in France, Italy, Mongolia, Nigeria, Poland, Romania, Spain, and Ukraine. In other countries, such as Kenya, South Africa, India, Germany, Austria, Czech Republic, India, Kenya, South Africa, the United States, there is no equivalent body, and judicial independence is thereby secured through various other mechanisms. Therefore, what is deemed to be an essential measure in some countries may be not considered as such in others. This reveals rather different views on the institutional means needed to protect judicial independence.

The process of defining the institutional requirements of judicial independence has by no means come to an end. For example, the oldest institution of the British constitutional system, the office of Lord Chancellor, has been recently redesigned in an effort to bring about a clearer separation between the branches of the State, and to enhance the independence of the judiciary (see the UK Constitutional Reform Act, 2005; Shetreet and Turenne, 2013).

The protection of judicial independence is usually considered as including various aspects that operate on different levels: external and internal independence, and institutional and individual independence. External independence refers to the independence of the judiciary from the political branches (Executive and Legislative power), as well as any other nonjudicial actor. Although there must, of necessity, be some relations between the judiciary and the political powers (especially the Executive), as stated in the Commentary on the Bangalore Principles "such relations must not interfere with the judiciary's liberty in adjudicating individual disputes and in upholding the law and values of the Constitution" (2007, para. 26). Internal independence focuses on guarantees aimed at protecting individual judges from undue pressure from within the judiciary: from other judges and, above all, from high ranking judges. High ranking judges may, for example, exert supervising power over courts' administration (depending on the organization of the judicial system), but they must not - in any way - influence the substance of judges' decision-making.

Institutional independence pertains to the institutional and legal arrangements designed ex ante by the State to shield judges from undue pressure and influence. From this point of view, the most important factors concern the way in which judges are recruited, evaluated, and disciplined, the governance of the judiciary and courts' administration.

5 0
2 years ago
Slaveholders claimed they treated slaves better than factory owners treated their workers. Is this a valid comparison? Explain.
Ivanshal [37]

Answer:

I dont think it is

Explanation:

Coming from a black person the way that slave owners treated black people was inhumane. We wre literally publically mocked and beaten. No one honestly had to go through that but black people. And till this day it still hurts and puts a nasty taste in my mouth about slave holders or owners

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following defines Broca's Area?
Nuetrik [128]
Broca’s area is the region in the frontal lobe, on the left side that is responsible for speech production.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Plsss someone help me asappp
    6·1 answer
  • What is it called when a psychology major chooses to focus on forensic psychology
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP BRAINLIST AND POINTS
    15·1 answer
  • What role did trade play in the spread of islam
    10·1 answer
  • You can hold it without using your hands or arms. What is it?
    5·2 answers
  • F (x) = 2 log 4 ( x + 7)
    15·1 answer
  • (SOCIOLOGY) As each religion has different “rules,” what flaws can you find with the Divine Command Theory? Give at least one ex
    10·1 answer
  • La divina comedia costumbres
    11·1 answer
  • You are driving a car that does not have Anti-lock Brakes (ABS). If the road is
    8·2 answers
  • Please, I need at least 5 advanced characteristics of television. Thanks.​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!