Which of these describes an economic effect of the Civil War?

1 answer:

6 0

Answer: The fields were left unplanted because the slaves had been freed and much of the small population was unavailable to plant or harvest crops.

Explanation:

There are still economic consequences caused by the Civil War. However, this one is undoubtedly one of the most significant. The post-war economy of the South was devastated because it had previously rested on the slave labour force. The fields that were already cultivated were left blank, and according to some records, the South lost over $ 2 billion. The result is the release of some 4.5 million who worked in cotton fields in the South.

You might be interested in

What did the supreme court justices declare in miller v. johnson (1995)?

Scorpion4ik [409]

The racial composition of a district could not be the predominant factor when redistricting.

5 0

3 years ago

What was the most important reason the Obama campaign set fundraising records in 2008?

katovenus [111]

Answer:

I think it is...

Explanation:

He used dozens of websites and social networking sites to mobilize millions of donors.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What happens when three-fourths of the states ratify an amendment?

saul85 [17]

The amendment becomes part of the Constitution when it has been ratified by three-fourths (currently 38) of the states. This process has been used for ratification of every amendment to the Constitution thus far. Article V also provides for an alternative process, which has never been utilized.

3 0

3 years ago

What instructions did the Viceroy give Coronado about the expedition?

Georgia [21]

d. He told Coronado to be slow and cautious about approaching the Natives.

8 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

World war i was known as a "total war" because it involved the efforts of many civilians in addition to the military. today, how

Sati [7]

If the story of "All Quiet on the Western Front" was told today, the story would be much different, especially if it was told from the viewpoint of an American soldier involved in the War on Terror. First, the protagonist would not be coming from a nation that is in a state of total war. The War on Terror is a limited war and does not require the undivided focus of the American government, industry, and economy. A soldier, today, would likely be volunteering to join the military, instead of being all but forced to like the characters in "All Quiet on the Western Front." Second, the total detachment the soldiers in "All Quiet on the Western Front" feel from their civilian lives would not be as pronounced, given how today's soldiers are able to communicate with their friends and family back home by way of email, online chat, and quicker postal service. Thirdly, today's American soldiers are provided with far better and more extensive military training than the soldiers in "All Quiet on the Western Front" are, hence they would be more prepared for the combat experiences they must endure.

4 0

3 years ago