Answer:
B. The higher the price-earnings ratio, the more investors are paying for earnings.
Explanation:
When analyzing a price-earnings ratio the higher the price-earnings ratio, the more investors are paying for earnings.
Price-earning ratio: It is a ratio of stock´s price per share to the company´s earning per share. It is a measure the share price in relative to the total earning by the company per share. Higher price earning ratio shows the higher demand for the share in the market. The investor wants to invest in the company´s share even if they have to pay a higher price per share as they anticipate better earning per share in the future. This ratio also helps in evaluating the performance of the company before investing.
Formula; Price-earning ratio= 
Answer:
$550,000
Explanation:
Data provided in the question
Issued amount = $550,000
Time period = 10 years
Stated interest rate = 12%
Market interest rate = 12%
Based on above information, as we can see that the stated interest rate is equal to market interest rate i.e 12% which reflects that it issued at par i.e face value
So in this case, the amount received at issuance is equal to the issued amount i.e $550,000
Answer:
real GDP
Explanation:
The above rule was proposed by Milton Friedman that the money supplied by the central bank be increased by constant percentage on annual basis. In other words, constant money growth rate rule suggested money supply growth rate be equal to GDP growth rate annually.
According to Friedman, monetary policy contributes to fluctuation in an economy. He suggested that the best way to stabilize a fluctuating economy is to allow the central bank increase money supply in the long run by a targeted amount annually irrespective of the situation of the economy.
Answer: Deficit; higher; a decrease
Explanation:
<em>The term crowding-out effect refers to a situation in which a government </em><em><u>deficit</u></em><em> results in</em><em><u> higher</u></em><em> interest rates, causing </em><em><u>a decrease</u></em><em> in private spending on investment and consumer durables.</em>
The Crowding-out effect is what happens when a Government increases its spending past its revenues and gets a budget deficit. In other to balance its books therefore it will borrow heavily.
If the Government is such a large one like the American Government or the British Government, the borrowing might be so large that it will have the effect of reducing the amount of loanable funds in the market thereby increasing the interest rates due to a reduced supply of loanable funds.
As there are now increased interest rates, it will be more expensive for companies to borrow to spend on investment or for consumers to spend on durables. It will have the effect of <em>crowding out</em> the private sector.
Answer:
a. Asarta Inc. could pay the fishermen $8,500 and keep polluting
Explanation:
The fishermen sell the fish for $8,000 a year at local market.
Due to pollution emitted by company into stream, their catch is dwindling and also their income.
The company benefits from usage of stream to the tune of $4,000 a year. In such scenario, if company compensates the fishermen for any amount between $8,000 and $40,000 then, in that case, optimal solution to the problem can be achieved in absence of any other transaction cost as per the Coase Theorem.
Therefore, The Asarta Inc. could pay the fishermen $8,500 and keep polluting.
