<span>The question is asking us to choose among the options. The background is that "The British Empire once controlled modern-day India. While many British historians once defended Great Britain's Right to rule over foreign colonies, British historians today largely take a negative view of such colonialism. Which of the following best explains why this change in interpretation might have occurred?" Here, the major reason is that the values changed - before, people believed in the superiority of white people while now it is believed that all people are equal. This means that they have different subjective options that influence how they see the events - biases. So the best answer is:
B. Historians today have different biases than previous historians.</span><span />
A characteristic that all state constitutions have in common is that they all "include a bill of rights". These bills of rights were included to ensure that the government did not trample on the natural human rights of the citizens.
<span>This means that there is no reason to go to war unless both sides of the argument are unable to see and understand what the other side is trying to justify. Having a conviction in a cause or a belief without looking at the other side of the coin and trying to understand what might be seen as an uncomfortable viewpoint is what often leads to skirmishes and wars.</span>
Answer:
Stephen F Austin was the "Father Of Texas". He was the founder of Texas. He brought 300 families to the area. Even though he was not aloud he did it anyway.
hope this helps!
I guess the answer is D.Sir Walter Raleigh.
