Answer:
Peripatric speciation
Explanation:
Peripatric speciation usually is an occurrence which happens when a small group of individuals break off of the main group to form a new species. This is similar to allopatric speciation, in this case, the two groups are separated by physical barriers such as mountain ranges or waterways, making it almost impossible for the two groups to interbreed.
There is always a special gene in the smaller group that had been isolated from the parent group. This special gene could allow the particular species to develop thicker fur, longer limbs or even, in extremely rare cases, an entirely new body part.
Answer:
1- The U.S. blue-collar middle class has been in decline since at least 1975, and this decline has been accelerating since 2000. Many factors are at work, but one of the most visible is deindustrialization
2-A second issue sapping many Americans’ trust in their government is of generational inequities.
Those born in good times get advantages over those born in bad times. And those lucky generations have a stronger allegiance to a system that they benefited from.
3- The most profound economic and political change in the last 30 years is the rise of Wall Street.
The financial sector is arguably now bigger, richer and more powerful than ever before. Yet as its hold over the political system increases, its interests diverge from those of Main Street or the real economy, an argument even a former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund has made
Explanation:
Answer:
b: newspapers reported several alleged assaults on white women by black men
Explanation:
One cause of the 1906 Atlanta Riot was that newspapers reported several alleged assaults on white women by black men. Such reports provoked white readers to take action against blacks, even though no evidence of the crimes existed.
Feeling deep compass and admiration for someone.
I hope this helps.
Answer:
B The ordinance is narrowly tailored to serve an important government interest and does not unreasonably limit alternative channels of communication.
Explanation:
The court will base its decision on its determination that the ordinance is narrowly tailored to serve an important government interest and does not unreasonably limit alternative channels of communication. While the First Amendment protects the freedoms of speech and assembly, the government may reasonably regulate speech-related conduct in public forums through content‑neutral time, place, and manner regulation. Here, the ban on camping overnight in the park, a content-neutral regulation of a public forum, would be evaluated by the court based on if the ordinance is narrowly tailored to serve an important government interest and does not unreasonably limit alternative channels of communication. In this scenario, the question would be if the ban on the use of the park will limit alternative channels of communicating the message of the scout leader and if yes the ban may be lifted and if not, it will not be lifted.
