1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Advocard [28]
3 years ago
9

The Warren Court ruled that a state law forbidding the sale of birth control was unconstitutional because

History
2 answers:
solmaris [256]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Unconstitutional because it violated the right to privacy.

Explanation:

The Griswold v. Connecticut was a case that was decided by the US Supreme Court because the Connecticut Comstock Act of 1873 made it illegal to use any drug with the purpose to prevent conception.

On this case, the Supreme Court ruled a 7-2 decision that stated the Constitution protects the right of marital privacy against state restrictions on contraception. It is not explicit but the Bill of Rights creates a series of zones that establish a right to privacy in marital relations.

brilliants [131]3 years ago
4 0
<span>Unconstitutional because it violated the right to privacy.</span>
You might be interested in
The war on the western front was the stalemate buy 1916 what was the effect of this development
slava [35]
Neither side made progress in the war
4 0
3 years ago
How does federalism limit the power of government in the United States?
vichka [17]

Federalism limits the power of government in the United States through the creation of two sovereign powers: the national government and state governments. In this way, it regulates the influence these have. Separation of powers establishes internal limits; it divides government against itself, giving separate functions to different branches and compelling them to share power, so neither of them becomes predominant.

By separating powers, these are split among the executive (president, vice president, Cabinet), legislative (Congress, House of Representatives and Senate), and judicial branches (Supreme Court and other courts), which are definite departments of American national government.


3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Spanish-American War resulted from an attempt to enforce the principles expressed by which of these? A) The Declaration of I
irakobra [83]

The correct answer is D. The Spanish-American War resulted from an attempt to enfoce the principles expressed by the Monroe Doctrine.

The Monroe Doctrine, synthesized in the phrase "America for the Americans", was elaborated by John Quincy Adams and attributed to President James Monroe in 1823. It established that any European intervention in America would be seen as an act of aggression that would require intervention of the United States. The doctrine was presented by President Monroe during his sixth State of the Union Address. It was taken with doubts, at first, and then with enthusiasm. It was a decisive moment in the foreign policy of the United States. The doctrine was conceived by its authors, especially John Quincy Adams, as a proclamation by the United States of its opposition to colonialism in response to the threat posed by the monarchical restoration in Europe and the Holy Alliance after the Napoleonic wars.


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Part A
bogdanovich [222]

Answer:

Explanation:

Essay Segment or Quote Rubric Rating Comments

 Briefly describe ONE major difference between Nash’s and Maier’s historical interpretations of the origins of the American Revolution.

Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development from the period 1754–1800 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Nash’s argument.

Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development from the period 1754–1800 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Maier’s argument.

3

2

1

The response to (a) did not earn a point because it is does not adequately describe the arguments of Nash and Maier. It merely lists the idea that Maier believed the Revolution emerged from old ideas, and Nash believed the Revolution was based on new ideas.

The response to (b) earned 1 point by providing evidence that the Boston Tea Party was a specific event that demonstrated the colonists’ rebellion against Great Britain’s taxation, which supports Nash’s argument. The response to

(c) did not earn a point because the Boston Massacre does not support Maier’s argument that the Revolution originated from earlier revolutionary thought.

7 0
3 years ago
What issue was discussed at the seneca falls convention?
Iteru [2.4K]
The Seneca falls convention was the first women's rights convention held in the United States
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • URGENT PLEASE ANSWER Why did the US go to war against Afghanistan one month after the attacks?
    9·1 answer
  • At what time did WW2 start?
    7·1 answer
  • Who had better citizenship, the Athenians or Romans?
    15·2 answers
  • A wave passes a point 80 times per second what is the frequency
    6·1 answer
  • What is no man's land
    11·2 answers
  • Compare the lifestyle of hunter gatherers with those of settlers in early agriculture communities
    10·1 answer
  • Why did Germany attack France first?
    8·1 answer
  • The great compromise established
    7·2 answers
  • Which us group did not share in the prosperity of the 1920s
    12·1 answer
  • the united states was a growing young country without a long history. so americans looked to other countries for cultural direct
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!