1. Kennedy agreed to end the crises because they sent him a long rambling letter searching for a way out of the crises. The basic proposition was that if the U.S made a none invasion pledge then the soviets would remove their military presence in Cuba. From the U.S point of view, this was perfect.
2. Khrushchev agreed to end the crises because he wanted to avoid nuclear war and both sides acknowledged the risk, so both men agreed to end the crises to prevent war in any way possible.
3. On a scale i think both sides ended up winning because it could’ve ended up in a big devastating war between both sides of Kennedy would’ve refused the letter. Therefore i think both men won on protecting themselves from mass destruction on their land.
Yes the founding fathers were justified in rebelling against the British government.
The justification for their declaration comes from the series of things that they suffered from the hands of the British people.
They were subjected to paying too much taxes in the colonies.
They had no representatives in the parliament
They had a lot of trade restrictions too in the area
Rebelling against the British was a way of seeking their freedom from the oppressions that they faced. The declaration of Independence clearly gave reasons for their actions.
The answer is True for your question
