Eichmann trial was different in several ways. The public could, for the first time, watch coverage of the trial on television. The Eichmann trial brought the true scope of the Holocaust into public focus, filling the pages of newspapers with the stories of Holocaust survivors. While previous trials, including the Nuremberg Trials, had focused primarily on documentary evidence, the Eichmann trial called Holocaust survivors to the stand to share their personal experiences, with approximately 100 survivors taking the stand and testifying during the trial, which lasted from April 1960 until August 1961.
Answer:
Sargon
In order to maintain his presence throughout his empire, Sargon strategically placed his best and most trusted men in positions of power in the various cities. The "Citizens of Akkad", as a later Babylonian text calls them, were the governors and administrators in over 65 different cities.
Explanation:
For the case of Japan, in 1868 new government of Japan underway
after Shogun decided to reestablish prerogatives of the Emperor's removal in
peace. Political style had altered from the shogunate to constitutional empire,
which constitution was founded on German's Staatsrecht those days. Japan
was reorganized and swayed by western society and culture but Japanese
government didn't follow as same. Instead Japan adapt and select some parts of
them only very suitable for them. Japan tried to draw near with West and
USA. They completed a lot of allocation to get worldwide rational, knowledge
and education for evading from the closed society (national isolation) in the
world.
For the case of the US, Twain and Warner were not erroneous
about the era’s exploitation, but the years between 1877 and 1900 were likewise
some of the utmost significant and active in American history. They set in signal
advances that would mold the country for generations like the reunification of
the South and North, the incorporation of four million anew unbound African
Americans, westward growth, immigration, industrialization, and urbanization.
<span>In the question "As time went on, how did the Russian people view their country's participation in World War 1", the correct answer is A" They opposed it because of the high casualty rate. As so many soldiers were being killed, the war felt unnecessary for Russia to take part in; the people were not persuaded to fight on any side or partake in a failing war.</span><span />