Most famous of the governors, Peter Stuyvesant, was also the most headstrong and shortsighted.… …of the Dutch period was Peter Stuyvesant, director general of New Netherland in 1647–64. In 1658 Peter Stuyvesant, Dutch governor of New Netherland, established the settlement of Nieuw Haarlem
Answer:
Irrespective of its genuine strategic objectives or its complex historical consequences, the campaign in Palestine during the first world war was seen by the British government as an invaluable exercise in propaganda. Keen to capitalize on the romantic appeal of victory in the Holy Land, British propagandists repeatedly alluded to Richard Coeur de Lion's failure to win Jerusalem, thus generating the widely disseminated image of the 1917-18 Palestine campaign as the 'Last' or the 'New' Crusade. This representation, in turn, with its anti-Moslem overtones, introduced complicated problems for the British propaganda apparatus, to the point (demonstrated here through an array of official documentation, press accounts and popular works) of becoming enmeshed in a hopeless web of contradictory directives. This article argues that the ambiguity underlying the representation of the Palestine campaign in British wartime propaganda was not a coincidence, but rather an inevitable result of the complex, often incompatible, historical and religious images associated with this particular front. By exploring the cultural currency of the Crusading motif and its multiple significations, the article suggests that the almost instinctive evocation of the Crusade in this context exposed inherent faultlines and tensions which normally remained obscured within the self-assured ethos of imperial order. This applied not only to the relationship between Britain and its Moslem subjects abroad, but also to rifts within metropolitan British society, where the resonance of the Crusading theme depended on class position, thus vitiating its projected propagandistic effects even among the British soldiers themselves.
Explanation:
We went through a time where most government’s around the world where monarchies. His new way of thinking challenged common thinking of the time and was later credited during and after the enlightenment where his ideas became common thinking in the modern era.
Answer:
C. The Democrats controlled politics in Georgia is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Well that's easy. Auschwitz was a death camp, and Manzanar was an internment camp. The difference is that Auschwitz was used by the National Socialist German Workers Party (Nazis) as a eugenics machine. Eugenics is the practice of removing certain genes from the gene pool, through sterilization, or murder to create a perfect human race (Aryan). While Manzanar was used to hold 11,000 Japanese Americans during world war two who were seen as public enemies. Both Concentration camps and Internment camps were racially motivated, and both were used for public enemies. Concentration camps were far more violent, and were also politically motivated, used to remove party enemies.
