Answer:
a.Georgeland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing clothing.
Explanation:
A country has a comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared with other countries.
A person has an absolute advantage in production if it produces more quantities of the good when compared with other countries.
Georgeland produces more quantities of both food and clothes when compared to Alland, so it has absolute advantage in both activities .
The opportunity cost of georgeland in producing clothes = 36 / 18=2
The opportunity cost of georgeland producing food = 18 / 36 = 0.5
For Alland,
the opportunity cost of producing clothes = 32 / 16= 2
the opportunity cost of producing food = 16 / 32 = 0.5
Neither countries don't have a comparative advantage in the production of either clothes of food bedside they have the same opportunity costs in both activities.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
Explanation:
The computation of expense amount is shown below:
= Expenses - adjusted prepaid expense + adjusted accrued expense
= $35,200 - $500 - $450
= $34,250
The adjusted prepaid expense is computed by
= Ending balance of prepaid expense - beginning balance of prepaid expense
= $1,800 - $1,300
= $500
And, the The adjusted accrued expense is computed by
= Ending balance of accrued expense - beginning balance of accrued expense
= $1,200 - $1,650
= -$450
<h2>Answer : Option A) 1 foot/second</h2><h3>Explanation :</h3>
If we consider that the plates are placed 2 ft apart and there has to be 1800 meals that needs to be delivered in an hour.
so if we multiply 2 ft and 1800 meals that is delivered in 1 hour,we get 2 X 1800 = 3600 meals in an hour.
If we try to accommodate the plates at each ft then there will be 3600 meals delivered in 1 hour.
we know that 1 hour has 3600 seconds in it.
So, here the distance is 1 ft, and speed has to be determined time is 1 hour = 3600 seconds
3600 meals / 3600 seconds = 1 foot per second.
OR 1800 meals set at 2 ft apart in 3600 seconds will give the speed of the belt as 1 foot per second.
(1 ft = speed X 1 hour)
<h2>so, the speed also will be 1 foot per second. </h2>
Answer:
Company Save $37000 by Buying
Explanation:
given data
make component part = 100 units
Direct Materials = $122000
Direct Labor = 34000
Variable Overhead = 55000
Fixed Overhead = 30000
purchase the component = $200000
fixed costs = $4000
to find out
make or buy decision
solution
first we find here Total Cost for Making component part
total cost = Direct Materials + Direct Labor + Variable Overhead + Fixed Overhead ..............1
put here value
total cost for make = $122000 + 34000 + 55000 + 30000
total cost for make = $241000
and
now we find here Total Cost for buying component part
total cost = Purchase Price + fixed costs ............2
put here value we get
total cost for buying = $200000 + $4000
total cost for buying = $204000
so
we can say Company Save = $241000 - $204000 = $37000 by Buying
Answer:
The firm will not sell any bundle, the amount of bundle to be sold will be zero.
Explanation
Solution
Since firm sells at $25 each for coats and pants, then If consumer wants to purchase both Pant and Coat, the customer will have to pay 25 + 25 = $50.
Also, If consumer purchase Pant and Coat as a Bundle then, he will pay 150. From the question stated we can conclude that their is a form of interest to pay for Pant and Coat for Both consumers are higher than 25.
However, they will have to pay an amount less for 1 coat and 1 pant if they buy this in a separate way instead of a Bundle.
We can say, that type of consumers (both) will not buy the pants and coat as a bundle, but will want to buy them separately.
Therefore, any bundle will not be sold by firm. the amount of Bundle sold will be known as a zero Bundle
