There are good arguments on both sides as to when and how fast to reopen the economy. In my view, the answer will vary state by state and industry by industry. There’s also an enormous amount of uncertainty as to exactly how to determine the optimal policy. In that environment, there’s a great advantage to having these decisions be made at as local a level as possible. Thus, while I suspect that Sweden’s current policy is not optimal, that Nordic country is doing a great service to Europe by providing evidence on the consequences of an alternative policy path.
Giving too much power to any one person is dangerous, especially when that person might be influenced by political considerations that go beyond the best interest of the country as a whole:
That’s not to say Trump’s views are necessary wrong; rather that the procedure he uses to reach decisions is not reliable. Thus I’d still favor local control even if in one particular case you could convince me that the views of the person who happened to be president at the time were superior to the views of the average mayor or governor. In the long run, competition between states will produce better governance than central planning.
I think it’s B because it makes more sense to me in a sentence
Answer:
the city's home-rule charter
Explanation:
The home rule charter will provide all the information regarding the responsibilities that actually given to the government compared to the responsibilities that can be taken on by the local people.
The charter itself is not going to give specific numbers on the amount of people serving on a city’s governing body.
But it can be used to consult or assist your research . You can find out all the responsibilities of your local government, and make a rough prediction on the number of people needed to run it.
