Answer:
Margaret has been classified as high in extraversion. According to Eysenck's theory, she is most likely to seek out a(n) <em><u>stimulating</u></em> environment in order to <u><em>raise her level of arousal.</em></u>
Explanation:
Eysenck's theory address that the environment has a role in a person's psychology, and consequently, on the behavior and personality. If Margaret has an extraversion personality, it's normal she is going to seek out a stimulating environment, because she wants to enjoy all the excitement that the place can offer to her, and raise her level of arousing. It would be strange if she was looking for something opposite of that.
Domestically, the Reagan administration enacted a major tax cut, sought to cut non-military spending, and eliminated federal regulations. The administration's economic policies, known as "Reaganomics", were inspired by supply-side economics. The combination of tax cuts and an increase in defense spending led to budget deficits, and the federal debt increased significantly during Reagan's tenure. Reagan signed the Tax Reform Act of 1986, which simplified the tax code by reducing rates and removing several tax breaks, as well as the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986,
Answer:
Occam's Razor
Explanation:
According to my research on different scientific theories, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this key characteristic is explained as the critical thinking principle of Occam's Razor. This theory states that between two explanations for a certain occurrence, the simpler explanation is usually correct.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
The answer to:
Which of the following is the most appropriate action to take for the investigator? Is:
We need to send a copy of the informed consent to the subject's wife. Then, after she speaks with the investigator she can sign the consent and send it back.
The correct answer for:
Which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of an exculpatory language?
Is:
I reject any possible compensation for injuries that might affect me as a result of my participation in this research.
Explanation:
The reasons behind the answers are: In the first question we need to find the quickest way to send the consent. It can be scanned, faxed, etc. But we need to understand that it has to be signed by the wife as she is the one with the authority to provide us the consent as the subject is unable to do so. The reason for the second question is that in the first place the consent has to include a direct statement of liberating the research, the organization behind it, and the person from any responsibility of complication.
