It can be helpful when:
- The intervention occurs with a humanitarian purpose, as in a country that just had a couple of its cities wasted by a natural disaster, like a tsunami or tornado.
- Or in a country which its population has been suffering from hunger for decades due to political crises or coups
It can be ineffective or even destructive when:
- It's a military extreme intervention on a city or country that although on war, it's still very populated by civilians. Like it was in the War on Terror campaign, started by the US after the 9/11 terrorist assault, with American invasion on Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and others. It ended up being effective, with even the fall of Al-Qaeda's terrorist organization leader in 2011, but in the process several cases of violent acts against and deaths of civilians were reported.
<span>
West African empires utilized CENTRALIZED governments ruled by KINGS. </span>
8. A
9.C
10.D
11.C
12.B
13.A
14.C
15.B
hope this helps :)
Civil rights are what a specific area has for laws or rights of people in that area and human rights are rights that every human being has
Answer:
The correct answer would be <em><u>D. brought Britain into the war</u></em>
Explanation:
During this time, the British wanted no part of the First world war.
Germany couldn't breach the French Maginot line. So if going through, under, or over wasn't effective, why not go around it? This operation was called the Schlieffen Plan. This was pretty much attacking Belgium and going through Belgium to France.
Britain was allies with Belgium and didn't really like their allies being curve stomped by German troops.
(Simplified)
