1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Iteru [2.4K]
4 years ago
14

How was the roman public assembly different from its senate

History
2 answers:
Marrrta [24]4 years ago
6 0
Any male citizen could participate in the public assembly, while senators had to be appointed by consuls.
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]4 years ago
3 0
 any male citizen could participate in the public assembly while senators had to be appointed by consuls
You might be interested in
Explain how the assassination of the Austrian archduke was an important event.
Flura [38]

Austria-Hungary had control over Serbia, but Serbia did not like that fact. A group of terrorist Serbians called "The Black Hand" assassinated Archduke Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary to assert their frustration over them. This started opening up some of the secret alliances, and Austria-hungary and Serbia went to war. Germany was allied with Austria-hungary at the time, so they joined the fight and declared war on Russia, one of Serbia's allies. Then Germany declared war on France, who had England backing them up. Finally, Germany sank of the United States's ships (actually multiple), thus causing almost all major countries to go at war with one another.

7 0
3 years ago
Amendment 10 of the Constitution specifically states, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor pr
FromTheMoon [43]

Correct answer:

<h2>Limited government</h2>

The 10th Amendment puts limits on the powers of the federal government.  It reserves powers for the states (and for the people themselves) any powers not specifically designated to the federal government in the United States Constitution.   Any laws and powers exercised by the states still must be in accord with what is stated in the US Constitution, however.

For some historical context, we might also consider that the original framers of the US Constitution thoughts that statements such as the 10th Amendment -- and all of the first 10 Amendments, known as the Bill of Rights -- were already inherent in the Constitution as it was written.  They had composed a constitution that intentionally placed limits on the federal government. So, stating such a limit in an amendment seemed like a repetition of what was already apparent in the Constitution itself.  As noted by the National Constitution Center, "The Constitution’s Framers thought that a bill of rights was appropriate for an unlimited government, but not for a limited one like the national government created by the Constitution. The Constitution accordingly sought to secure liberty through enumerations of powers to the government rather than through enumerations of rights to the people."

Nevertheless, to assure those who wanted the rights of the people specifically listed and protected, Amendments 1 through 10 were added to the Constitution as a Bill of Rights to affirm those protections.

8 0
4 years ago
An archive contains a manuscript by a Chinese prince who was very interested in the dynasties that came before his own. He made
Eva8 [605]

Answer:

The prince's assignment seems to be a secondary source of heritage mostly on a basis including its description provided in the previous section.

Explanation:

  • They would come into the heading of secondary sources and therefore not primary, as even the Chinese prince composed certain documents long afterward those who supposedly happened.
  • Valuable methods for learning historical events that happen in a single location, both primary as well as a secondary source of data.
8 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ME DUE NOW AND I DONT UNDERSTAND PLEASE :(
REY [17]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

When they are washing away the hillside in order to find gold, the excess soil was washed down to other bodies of water, thus filling these rivers with sediment.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A common misconception in history is that all the Founding Fathers were radicals and
NikAS [45]

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

The Founding Fathers were from multiple different political parties. They didn't despise law and order, they just didn't want to be under the rule of the King of England. The whole reason they left England was to escape that rule. They understood that rule was needed, just not that type of rule.

I hope this helps!!! :D

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is the population small in the Tierra caliente climate zone? too cold too temperate too hot too mountainous
    9·2 answers
  • In 1603, King James 1 started a new acting company called ____ and he made shakespeare a ______
    8·1 answer
  • Scarcity exists when there are resources to meet unlimited needs and wants. Because of , we must make choices about how to use r
    8·2 answers
  • During the high middle ages monastaries were considered religious centers as well as
    13·1 answer
  • Which year was the bloodiest of World War I?<br> a. 1915<br> b. 1916<br> c. 1917<br> d. 1918
    9·1 answer
  • Por que as eleições presidenciais de 1910 provocaram, no ano seguinte, a revolução mexicana?
    12·1 answer
  • What made Shirley Chisholm such a strong political force?
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT a government policy that affected Native American culture?
    5·1 answer
  • How do extreme groups affect our country?
    6·2 answers
  • Help pls What was an effect of the Kansas- Nebraska Act?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!