Answer:
1. The bourgeoisie resented its exclusion from political power and positions of honor.
2. The peasants were acutely aware of their situation and were less and less willing to support the anachronistic and burdensome feudal system.
3. The philosophies had been read more widely in France than anywhere else.
4. French participation in the American Revolution had driven the government to the brink of bankruptcy.
5. France was the most populous country in Europe, and crop failures in much of the country in 1788, coming on top of a long period of economic difficulties, compounded existing restlessness.
6. The French monarchy, no longer seen as divinely ordained, was unable to adapt to the political and societal pressures that were being exerted on it.
Explanation:
Answer:
A. approximately three-quarters (76 percent) of the subjects will conform to the group's judgment on at least one critical trial
Explanation:
Solomon Asch's conducted an experiment to determine how social pressure from a majoritywould affect a person to conform. In psychology, conformity is the likelihood of a person to follow the behavior of the social group an individual belongs to. In each experiment, a naive student was placed in a room with several other confederates who agreed in advance what their responses would be when presented with the line task without the real participant knowing. After line task was presented, the confederates began answering the questions correctly. However eventually began providing incorrect answers based on how they had been instructed by the experimenters. They were 18 trials and the confederates provided 12 wrong answers. The purpose of this experiment was to see if the participant would conform to that of the others in the group.
The result at the end of the experiment showed that approximately three-quarters (76 percent) of the subjects will conform to the group's judgment on at least one critical trial.
She is fluent in both her native tongue and second language.
Chose answer a because that sounds the most realistic answer to your question
Answer:The court’s decision ruled that the laws of Louisiana were not in conflict with the Constitution. The justices wrote that Plessy’s defense wrongly assumed that separate facilities somehow made one race automatically inferior to another.
Further, they ruled that if one race is already socially inferior to another, there was nothing that the Constitution or other acts of legislation could do to fix that. To this end, the majority opinion states that the Fourteenth Amendment “could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political, equality, or a commingling of the two races upon terms unsatisfactory to either.”
Explanation: This comes directly from the answer.
