As the first responder to a suspected terrorist or weapon of mass destruction incident, you should request additional resources as needed and then provide procedures for activating response resources.
- A weapon of mass destruction is a nuclear, radiological, chemical, biological, or other device designed to cause widespread devastation. Every day, the Department of Homeland Security works to keep terrorists and other threat actors from using these weapons against Americans.
- A terrorist assault requires extensive planning and attention to detail. Terrorists must make plans and preparations, purchase and store materials, and find sources of funding, just like other criminals. The public is able to see a lot of this activity.
- If you suspect a chemical, biological, or nuclear attack, this text will not provide you with the necessary training to protect yourself completely. In this case, your primary responsibility is to contact those responders who have the necessary training and equipment.
Learn more about Mass destruction incident from here:brainly.com/question/14449364
#SPJ4
Answer:
Both a. and b.
Explanation:
Premolar and molar teeth are part of your body. Teeth are a crucial part of the body that helps in chewing and digesting food. The teeth are made up of some proteins such as collagen and some minerals such as calcium. Teeth help us in speaking. We have around 32 teeth which are called permanent or secondary teeth.
There are 8 incisors, 4 canines, 8 premolars and the 12 are molars. Children have only 20 teeth. The premolar and molar as well as temporalis muscles and sagittal crest help in cutting, chewing, and digestion of food.
Which war. There been. Numbers of wars in history
The significance of the requirement of precedent in legal argument is best expressed by the fact that similar cases must be decided similarly.
<h3>What is a legal argument?</h3>
It should be noted that a legal argument simply means an argument using laws to deduce conclusions.
In this case, the significance of the requirement of precedent in legal argument is best expressed by the fact that similar cases must be decided similarly.
Learn more about legal arguments on:
brainly.com/question/9524284
Answer:
Yes, John can file suit agianst his neighbour over the issue.
Explanation:
<em>Houses built all over the world do follow a standard laid down plan that try to accomodate the needs of all individuals involved. That is why, in any given neighbourhood, there is a specific way which all the houses going to be found would be built and in most cases with little or no fence.</em>
For John's new neighbour to plan to build a new fence that will block all the sunlight shows that it would be a long fence and on the long run, he is not going to follow the laid down master plan for building in that Estate.
This singular act is enough ground for John to file a law suit against his neighbour inorder to restore sanity in the environment.
