Explanation:
The journal entries are as follows
On December 31
Bad debt expense Dr $4,115 ($823,000 × 0.50%)
To Allowance for doubtful debts $4,115
(Being the bad debt expense is recorded)
On Feb 01
Allowance for doubtful debts Dr $412
To Account receivable $412
(Being the uncollectible amount is recorded)
On June 5
Account receivable $412
To Allowance for doubtful debts Dr $412
(Being the uncollectible amount is recorded)
On June 5
Cash Dr $412
To Account receivable $412
(Being the cash received is recorded)
Answer: $369,500
Explanation:
The Cost concept of accounting calls for the recording of Assets at their cost.
Clementine Repair services offered to buy the land at $350,500 when it was priced at $388,500.
The seller countered with $369,500 and Clementine accepted this.
This means that Clementine bought the land for $369,500 which makes it the cost price.
They should therefore record it at $369,500.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The damages can be recovered as Jerome and Gary hung the playground swing improperly. A child was injured due to their negligent actions. The case will be on Meadowbrook Playground and not on the individual person who has committed the mistake. According to law, the damages can be recovered as the enterprise owned the whole property, and due to their carelessness in the installation of swing, the accident took place. The child's parent has every right to recover damages from the playground owner.
Answer:
A strictly dominant action produces: a higher payoff than any other action the player can use for every possible action of the other players.
Explanation:
A strictly dominant action does not play fair. Here, there is no equality because strict dominance requires all payoffs to be strictly greater.
A strictly dominant strategy is that strategy that always provides greater utility to a the player, no matter what the other player's strategy is.
A rational player will avoid a strictly dominated counterpart because if his opponent uses strictly dominated action he will be come out worse off regardless of which moves other players make.
Answer:
a. No, because Shelby made a mistake about the dog's value, not a mistake about a material fact.
Explanation:
Peggy made an offer to sell the dog for $800, they didn't discuss the dog's ancestry and Shelby wrongly assumed the dog was from champion lines and agreed to buy the dog for $800.
Based on further investigations, she discovered the dog was worth just $200.
She cannot rescind the contract because she wrongly assumed the dog's value not an error about à material fact. Peggy sold the dog at her own rates and Shelby bought the dog while wrongly assuming the value, so she cannot cancel the contract based on that.
