Answer:
The firm will not sell any bundle, the amount of bundle to be sold will be zero.
Explanation
Solution
Since firm sells at $25 each for coats and pants, then If consumer wants to purchase both Pant and Coat, the customer will have to pay 25 + 25 = $50.
Also, If consumer purchase Pant and Coat as a Bundle then, he will pay 150. From the question stated we can conclude that their is a form of interest to pay for Pant and Coat for Both consumers are higher than 25.
However, they will have to pay an amount less for 1 coat and 1 pant if they buy this in a separate way instead of a Bundle.
We can say, that type of consumers (both) will not buy the pants and coat as a bundle, but will want to buy them separately.
Therefore, any bundle will not be sold by firm. the amount of Bundle sold will be known as a zero Bundle
Answer:
$60,000
Explanation:
The computation of the estimated manufacturing overhead is shown below:
Estimated manufacturing overhead = Direct labor hours × predetermined overhead rate
where,
Direct labor hours = Total Direct labor cost ÷ Cost per hour
= ($100,000 × 75%) ÷ ($5)
= 15,000 direct labor hours
Now the estimated manufacturing overhead equal to
= 15,000 direct labor hours × $4
= $60,000
44756 divided by 167 equals 268 with a remainder of 0
Answer:
X is $30,000
Explanation:
First, we need to calculate the Amount ofLoan
Amount of Loan = Car price - Down payment = $100,848 - $30,000 = $70,848
This is the situation of annuity payment for 4 years at a 25% interest rate with equal annuity payment each year.
Now we will use the following formula to calculate the value of X
PV of Annuity = Annuity payment x ( 1 - ( 1 + interest rate )^-numbers of years ) / Interest rate
Where
PV of Annuity = Amount of Loan = $70,848
Interest rate = 25%
Numbers of years = 4 years
Annuity Payment = X = ?
Placing values in the formula
$70,848 = X x ( 1 - ( 1 + 25% )^-4 ) / 25%
$70,848 = X x 2.3616
X = $70,848 / 2.3616
X = $30,000
Answer:
Financial disadvantage from further processing = $(9)
Explanation:
<em>A company should process further a product if the additional revenue from the split-off point is greater than than the further processing cost. </em>
<em>Also note that all cost incurred up to the split-off point (the cost of crushing) are irrelevant to the decision to process further . </em>
$
Sales revenue after crushing 55
Sales revenue at the split-off point <u>81</u>
Additional sales revenue 26
Further processing cost <u> (35)</u>
Net income after further processing <u> (9)
</u>
Financial disadvantage from further processing = $(9)
<em>Kindly note that the allocated joint costs( cost of sugar and crushing) are irrelevant. This implies that whether or not the intermediate products are processed further the joint costs are irrelevant to the decision to process the beet juice further</em>.
