Answer:
Leningrad, now known as Saint Petersburg
Ah, the scientific method. Well. Here it is:
1. Ask a question.
Be specific! Define your variables. Tara might like to ask something like “What are the effects of text-messaging rather than talking on the quality of friendships?” But she needs to define what counts as high quality and low quality friendship. Besides, what effects does she mean?
2. Make a hypothesis.
Something like “I believe the more text-messaging involved rather than taking, the lower quality the friendship will be.” Again, she should define her variables better. Make sure to use an independent and dependant variable.
3. Collect data.
Find a way to collect data. Surveys? Interviews? In-field observation? Keep it objective and informative. Remember the Hawthorne effect- don’t get to close to participants if it’s a study.
4. Represent your data.
Some people like using graphs or charts or some sort. Find a simple way to represent the data so it is easily understood.
5. Analyze and conclude
What conclusions can she draw from her research and data? Did it prove her hypothesis correct? If so, how? What else can she say about what she noticed?
There can be more or less official steps depending on your point of view. Some people like to include material lists, or theories, or sources of error. Do what you wish, but the scientific method cannot be used without first asking a question.
Answer:
Yes, I do agree with him.
Explanation:
I do agree with him, as sometimes investigative journalists today are sometimes overexaggerating while researching certain topics, and sometimes can be very biased. Therefore, it is of crucial interest that sometimes they should know when to stop, and to be realistic what is investigative journalism and what is going over the border.
Answer:
The answer to:
Which of the following is the most appropriate action to take for the investigator? Is:
We need to send a copy of the informed consent to the subject's wife. Then, after she speaks with the investigator she can sign the consent and send it back.
The correct answer for:
Which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of an exculpatory language?
Is:
I reject any possible compensation for injuries that might affect me as a result of my participation in this research.
Explanation:
The reasons behind the answers are: In the first question we need to find the quickest way to send the consent. It can be scanned, faxed, etc. But we need to understand that it has to be signed by the wife as she is the one with the authority to provide us the consent as the subject is unable to do so. The reason for the second question is that in the first place the consent has to include a direct statement of liberating the research, the organization behind it, and the person from any responsibility of complication.
True. In his of grammatology, Jacques Derrida set out to analyze the fundamental structure of thought by examining writing.
<h3>What is grammatology according to Derrida?</h3>
Derrida refers to the science of writing as "grammatology," and it can free our conceptions of writing from being constrained by those of speech. Grammatology is a way of studying the history of language that enables our understanding of writing to match our understanding of speech in terms of breadth.
Derrida acknowledges that a structure without organization or a core is inconceivable, but he argues that the center limits and lessens the potential for play within the framework. Play is therefore anything that undermines the structure's order and cohesion.
Read more on Jacques Derrida here: brainly.com/question/20570207
#SPJ1
