(This would have to be in your own opinion, "develop without interference from stronger nations" or a conclusion/ reasoning from the stronger nations to develop.) (Do you think that they still follow this in the United States? Treaties signed during and after the World war 2 reflecting a policy of greater cooperation between North and south America colonies. The United states continued to use Monroe Doctrine to justify its interference in the affairs of its southern neighbors.)(do you think such a policy should be followed in the modern world? This is also your opinion so it's up to you but the policy was made to warn Europe that the United states would not tolerate further colonization. The latian American countries already won their independence from Spain and Portugal but they were worried that the powers of continental Europe would make future attempts to restore colonial regimes in the region.) And depending on your opinion you can find cities and evidence for it. I'm sorry if this is confusing but I hope it helps you understand a little more
Your answer should be 13, sorry if I'm wrong
It's between A and B. The articles of confederation made the federal government weak and pretty much non-existent in terms of true power. Effectively each state was its own country more or less.
I think A and B sound pretty identical though perhaps choice A isn't the best answer because each state didn't really think about the country as a whole, but rather focused on their own backyard.
<h3>So that's why I'm thinking the final answer is choice B</h3>
Though I would get a second opinion on the matter.
