If a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, is the outcome necessarily Pareto efficient if a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, then the outcome is not necessarily Pareto efficient this is because another change in the policy could cause another Pareto improvement.
A Pareto development is a development of a device whilst an alternative in the allocation of goods harms no person and advantages as a minimum one character. Pareto enhancements also are called "no-brainers" and are generally predicted to be rare, due to the plain and effective incentive to make any available Pareto development.
Factors that lie within the PPF display an inefficient or below-usage of resources – this is Pareto inefficient. A Pareto development way that output of both products can increase as we move from inside the PPF to factors at the PPF boundary.
Learn more about Pareto here:
brainly.com/question/7304310
#SPJ4
Answer:
Take-back legislation
Explanation:
In the context of green marketing, take-back legislation provides strong incentives for redesigning products in ways that make it easier to reuse and recycle.
I hope it helps! Have a fantastic day!
Bored~
Answer:
Trading on equity defines the increase in profit earned by the equity shareholders due to presense to financial charges.
When a company is higher the rate of interest on borrowed funds.so company should option for trading on equity.
Explanation:
<em>h</em><em>o</em><em>p</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em>l</em><em>p</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>u</em><em /><em />
Answer:
A $660,030
Explanation:
Total cost of units completed and transferred out = Units Completed and Transferred x Cost per Equivalent Unit
Therefore,
Total cost of units completed and transferred out = 117,000
