The theme was that there was strength in unity which<span> family </span>ought to facilitate each other<span>. </span>once<span> the log was whole, </span>it absolutely was tough<span> for them </span>to interrupt how ever <span>once </span>it absolutely was<span> divided into smaller </span>items<span>, it </span>stony-broke simply<span>. </span>after they every<span> had their share of their inheritance, they fell into </span>poorness<span>. </span>the daddy<span> told his sons that </span>they ought to facilitate one another<span>. </span>once<span> one person </span>within the<span> family is in </span>would like<span>, the others </span>should facilitate<span>.</span>
Answer:
she asked ."is it hot today"
i think this is it
btw
hiii
hope ur fine
It's part of Freytag's pyramid: exposition ---> rising action ---> climax ---> falling action ---> denouement.
The exposition would be like the introduction and the denouement would be the resolution for sure. I think the climax would be the turning point so the rising action would be the complications. It might be vice versa. I'm not 100% sure which one goes with which.
If i were the judge who tried him for treason ,i would have examined all angles of the case.First,one of the bases of the trial should be John Brown's background and his journey against slavery. His advocacy against slavery which shows on his record should be enough to convict him.
