1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IRISSAK [1]
4 years ago
14

30 points and branliest

English
2 answers:
sweet-ann [11.9K]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

hey dezaria!!

Explanation:

On October, 16, 1859, John Brown and nearly two dozen comrades seized the armory at Harper's Ferry in West Virginia, hoping to use its massive arsenal in the struggle to forcibly end slavery. Captured and brought to trial at nearby Charles Town, Brown was found guilty of treason. One month before his execution, John Brown addressed a courtroom in Charlestown, West Virginia, defending his role in the action at Harper's Ferry. Henry David Thoreau, although himself did not favor violence, praised John Brown, and when the fiery Preacher was sentenced to death, Ralph Waldo emerson said: "He will make the gallows holy as the cross."

I have, may it please the Court, a few words to say.  In the first place, I deny everything but what I have all along admitted, the design on my part to free the slaves. I intended certainly to have made a clean thing of that matter, as I did last winter, when I went into Missouri and there took slaves without the snapping of a gun on either side, moved them through the country, and finally left them in Canada. I designed to have done the same thing again, on a larger scale. That was all I intended. I never did intend murder, or treason, or the destruction of property, or to excite or incite slaves to rebellion, or to make insurrection.  

      I have another objection; and that is, it is unjust that I should suffer such a penalty. Had I interfered in the manner which I admit, and which I admit has been fairly proved (for I admire the truthfulness and candor of the greater portion of the witnesses who have testified in this case), had I so interfered in behalf of the rich, the powerful, the intelligent, the so-called great, or in behalf of any of their friends, either father, mother, brother, sister, wife, or children, or any of that class, and suffered and sacrificed what I have in this interference, it would have been all right; and every man in this court would have deemed it an act worthy of reward rather than punishment.  

      This court acknowledges, as I suppose, the validity of the law of God. I see a book kissed here which I suppose to be the Bible, or at least the New Testament. That teaches me that all things whatsoever I would that men should do to me, I should do even so to them. It teaches me, further, to "remember them that are in bonds, as bound with them." I endeavored to act up to that instruction. I say, I am yet too young to understand that God is any respecter of persons. I believe that to have interfered as I have done as I have always freely admitted I have done in behalf of His despised poor, was not wrong, but right. Now, if it is deemed necessary that I should forfeit my life for the furtherance of the ends of justice, and mingle my blood further with the blood of my children and with the blood of millions in this slave country whose rights are disregarded by wicked, cruel, and unjust enactments, I submit; so let it be done!  

      Let me say one word further.  

      I feel entirely satisfied with the treatment I have received on my trial. Considering all the circumstances. it has been more generous than I expected. But I feel no consciousness of guilt. I have stated from the first what was my intention and what was not. I never had any design against the life of any person, nor any disposition to commit treason, or excite slaves to rebel, or make any general insurrection. I never encouraged any man to do so, but always discouraged any idea of that kind.  

      Let me say, also, a word in regard to the statements made by some of those connected with me. I hear it has been stated by some of them that I have induced them to join me. But the contrary is true. I do not say this to injure them, but as regretting their weakness. There is not one of them but joined me of his own accord, and the greater part of them at their own expense. A number of them I never saw, and never had a word of conversation with, till the day they came to me; and that was for the purpose I have stated.  

     Now I have done.  

If i were the judge who tried him for treason , i would have examined all angles of the case.

fenix001 [56]4 years ago
6 0
If i were the judge who tried him for treason ,i would have examined all angles of the case.First,one of the bases of the trial should be John Brown's background and his journey against slavery. His advocacy against slavery which shows on his record should be enough to convict him.
You might be interested in
If anyone wants a quick response to any type of question im here to help :)
satela [25.4K]

Answer:

hey i just posted a question i need help with :)

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
Kingslover Essay could be called a botanical essay because
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

what are the answer questions

8 0
3 years ago
What are the nouns and pronouns in this sentence Thomas would not stop talking with his mouth full, so the students got mad at h
Xelga [282]

Answer:

Noun- Thomas, Students, mouth

Pronouns- His, Him

Explanation:

A noun is the name of a person, animal, place or thing.

A pronoun is word that can take the place of a noun in a sentence.

From the sentence:

Thomas would not stop talking with his mouth full, so the students got mad at him.

The nouns and pronouns are;

Noun - Thomas, Students, mouth

Pronoun - His, Him

Thomas is a noun because it is the name of a person.

Mouth is noun because it is the name of an organ in the body.

Students is a common noun because it names a particular group of people.

His and Him are both pronouns because they were used in the sentence to replace the noun, Thomas.

5 0
3 years ago
I want sentence about blast
Shkiper50 [21]
And jimmy neutron said to carl wheezer, "gotta blast"
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Imagine the scene that the poet describes. What sense does the passage from "My Father's Song" appeal to the MOST?
azamat

The answer is: touch.

The poem "My Father's Song" uses verbs and descriptions that appeal to the sense of touch, suggesting the idea of getting close to an object and coming into contact with it. For example:

  • scooped
  • into the palm of his hand
  • touch
  • took them
  • put them
  • sand moist clod
  • softness
  • cool and warm sand
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Identify the sentence that builds a mood of anxiety.
    14·2 answers
  • Lazy ananis what is the them of the fable
    5·1 answer
  • Describe the flow of energy in this food chain. Be sure to use the names of the organisms and what role they serve in the food c
    5·1 answer
  • What are better verbs Being Verbs or action verbs for the word "like(related to)"?
    8·1 answer
  • The lecturer states that persuasive speeches are speeches of contention, this means they
    14·1 answer
  • How dose Whittier portray Garrison and himself throughout the poem?
    12·1 answer
  • 2. Which of these ingredients are required to support a fire?<br> Fuel.<br> Heat.<br> Oxygen.
    10·1 answer
  • In the book walk two moons Sal feels most comfortable in the country and that she considers Bybanks, Kentucky, her home. • Write
    12·1 answer
  • Who had the greatest impact on samuel development during his time in jamestown?
    9·1 answer
  • This is the use of words to convey the opposite of the actual meaning, it arises from an awareness of contrast between what is a
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!