The correct answer is A) a higher chance of reelection.
A potential benefit for a government leader using cost-benefit analysis is a higher chance of reelection.
A correct and useful method of decision-making is CBA or better known as cost-benefit analysis. This method is very simple. You compare your advantages to the disadvantages of the decision. You collect the information at hand and then proceed to make the best decision. In 1840, Julies Dupuit who was an Engineer from France started to use this method successfully. That is why is correct to say that a potential benefit for a government leader using cost-benefit analysis is a higher chance of reelection.
I believe the answer is James Madison being that he was a federalist and wrote the federalist papers
<span>Gallup's analysis of party affiliation in the U.S. states shows there are 14 solid Democratic states in the U.S. There are 9 Lean Democratic states in the U.S. There are 18 Competitve states. There are 5 Lean Republican states in the U.S. There are 5 solid Republican states in the U.S. </span>
<span>The correct answer is A. Both exercised military and economic domination over colonial territories.
Both French and British practised similar tactics to control and domination over their empires in Asia to profit economically and militarily from their colonies. Economically the French did well in Fur Trade while the British sold products to their colonies and acquired raw materials for their industries, getting products from their farms.
Both countries also used their colonial territories in Asia to serve as military bases when necessary.</span>
History is my strong suite tbh. I would say answer choice C for this question
