Answer:
this statement is true.............
A.
If you recall, negative externalities arise when there is a divergence between marginal private cost and marginal social cost, the difference being the marginal external cost as shown from the poorly drawn diagram. If we got rid of the marginal external cost by producing less, then the externality would dissipate.
However, the question is weird as there are no options for compensation. What would rather happen is that whoever has the property rights will be compensated the size of the MEC and there would be social welfare, whereas the question only tackles removing the externality through stopping production.
Distributions of cash or other resources by a business to its stockholder are called DIVIDENDS. Dividend involves the distribution of a portion of a company's profits to a class of its shareholders. The amount to be distributed is usually decided by the board of directors.
According to the logic behind the Rational Rule for Sellers, a company owner should increase output when the extra output D. adds more to revenue than it adds to costs.
According to the Rational Rule for Sellers, a seller should only choose the output level where the marginal cost is equal to the marginal revenue.
It should be noted that the owner of a company should increase output when the extra output adds more to revenue than it adds to costs. This is vital in order to increase the revenue and profit of the firm.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25670500