Answer:
Self-interest in a market system will automatically promote the public interest as well.
Explanation:
An economy is a function of how money, means of production and resources (raw materials) are carefully used to facilitate the demands and supply of goods and services to meet the unending needs or requirements of the consumers.
Hence, a region's or country's economy is largely dependent on how resources are being allocated and utilized, how many goods and services are to be produced, what should be produced, for whom they are to be produced for and how much money are to be spent by the consumers to acquire these goods and services.
A free-enterprise system also referred to as capitalism or free market can be defined as a type of economy in which prices, products and services are being determined by the market rather than the government. Thus, a free-enterprise system is devoid (free) of government regulations, interference or control because the market (enterprises) are the ones who are saddled with the responsibility of determining the market forces.
Simply stated, a free-enterprise system is a type of economy that is completely driven by demand and supply of goods and services.
The "invisible hand" concept asserts that the self-interest by producers and suppliers of resources in a market system will automatically promote the public interest as well.
This ultimately implies that, public and private interest will always coincide assuming there exist competition in a free market system.
In conclusion, the invincible hand concept is a metaphorical description of the unforeseen forces that typically moves a free market system or economy.
Buying and selling are at the centre of trading strategies that involve buying on one asset while selling another. Investors can also sell an asset in order to cut their losses. They may do this if one of there asset is dropping in value and they don't expect it to rise ever again.
An example of accepting liquidated damages is when valerie backed out of the deal and Kenneth kept the earnest deposit.
<h3>What is a
liquidated damages?</h3>
A liquidated damages refers to a pre-estimated probable loss that would be suffered from the late completion of a contract.
In conclusion, the example of accepting liquidated damages is when valerie backed out of the deal and Kenneth kept the earnest deposit.
Read more about liquidated damages
<em>brainly.com/question/25697446</em>
Answer:
<u><em>But where do we go from here? </em></u>
It depends on the result of more government intervention on quality life standards.
<u><em>Do we need less or more government involvement? </em></u>
It depends on the problems that need to be addressed. For example, to address problems such inequality it is mandatory that the government gets involve and create laws to prevent it. But surely for more movement of capitals there is no need of higher government involvement.
<u><em>Is it a question of the quality of that involvement? </em></u>
Yes. If government has an effective involvement there is even desirable to have its intervention but if it complicates everything then is repeled.
<u><em>Could it be smarter rather than just less? </em></u>
Yes, because it is proved that the economy acts in an effective way to good policy making.
<u><em>How can the cost of government involvement decrease?</em></u>
In this aspect it is important to mention the environmental issues in nowadasy economy. If the measurement of what is defined as "cost" is understand in the long run as conservation and balance between nature and economic explotation of resources.
Having to deliver is one bad having wider variety or costumers is a good language change witch could cost to have a translator
