1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
exis [7]
3 years ago
8

do you believe women would have still received the opportunities they had if America never entered the war​

History
1 answer:
nasty-shy [4]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

I think they would have still gotten opportunities but it would take longer. The war gave women many jobs for example helping construct ships, make clothes

Explanation:

You might be interested in
List three responsibilities of a minister.
levacccp [35]

Answer:

For education minister

Explanation:

This Ministry is responsible for curriculum and guidelines for all officially recognized elementary and secondary schools in the province and some outside the province. The ministry is also responsible for public and separate school boards across Ontario, but are not involved in the day-to-day operations.

6 0
3 years ago
I need help!!<br><br> How can I descried the effects of the Spanish-American War.
denis23 [38]

By the Treaty of Paris (signed Dec. 10, 1898), Spain renounced all claim to Cuba, ceded Guam and Puerto Rico to the United States, and transferred sovereignty over the Philippines to the United States for $20 million. The Spanish-American War was an important turning point in the history of both antagonists.May 14, 2010


6 0
2 years ago
Please paraphrase, thank you!
madreJ [45]

In order to paraphrase a text you should understand each paragraph's main ideas and then think of other citations and examples of your own to complete the logic of it.

1 - The Beard interpretation has two main problems: first, there isn’t in the Constitution any confession or strong sign of the influence from those who believed the fundamental private rights of property being fundamentally anterior to government and morally unreachable for the popular majorities; second, it is impossible to deny the Constitution as a document in federalism.

2 - These problems should be addressed. The second is simple for it is consensual amongst Revolutionary era historians that the big question of that moment was: how to articulate diverse parts of an empire towards common purposes? And how to realize that articulation without taking one side more than another, without transforming demands for liberty and autonomy into central government undermining. It can be argued that’s the same debate over Federal aid to education.  

3 - The Declaratory Act was a declaration of the British failure in solving this same problem, about which Edmund Burke sharply observed the impossibility of arguing anyone into slavery. When it was time for Americans to deal with this dilemma the Articles of Confederation were adequate when discussing the distribution of powers but lacking in sanctions. This deficiency was the cause of the Philadelphia Convention.

4 - Although Beard’s interpretation is convincing when arguing that those who wrote the Constitution belonged to the propertied classes, he is not as convincing about this being reflected on the Constitution itself. If the framers were trying to protect their property they didn’t succeed.  Our analysis of the Economic Interpretation of the Constitution shows that the auteur’s reading of that historical moment fails to legitimate itself when confronted with the Constitution’s text. What each of the framers did after the Constitution and how it was directly linked to his class isn’t enough proof of the auteur’s argument if it isn’t shown also through the Constitution.  

6 0
3 years ago
SUMMARIZING
Alika [10]

Answer:

Ther Great Compromise was an agreement reached between the representatives of states with small populations and their counterparts from states with large populations at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. It defined the structure of Congress. It was agreed that there would be a bicameral Congress, with one lower chamber (the House of Representatives) with proportional representation, and an upper chamber (the Senate) with two senators by each state. The agreement was brokered by Connecticut representative Roger Sherman, that´s why it is also called the Sherman Compromise.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
12. During Prohibition, illegal saloons were called
Strike441 [17]
During the prohibition in the United States illegal saloons were called speakeasies. They were called this because they were often located in an attic or basement were you needed to whisper a password or speak easy and you needed to stay quiet while inside.
4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Select the two true statements about Prince Henry's school of navigation.
    14·2 answers
  • What conditions in the south were like after the civil war?
    8·1 answer
  • What was the name of the Democrats that supported the Confederacy?
    9·1 answer
  • _______ is a method of Bible study in which passages are examined in light of their placement, history, purpose, and context.
    14·2 answers
  • Why did France fall so easily to the Nazis?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following contributed to the Soviet Union and the United States
    15·1 answer
  • Assume the Congress approves increased drilling for oil in the U.S. to address the current energy shortage. People who are in fa
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following best
    12·1 answer
  • Name a modern day caliphate which was recently defeated
    5·1 answer
  • Choose one new mode of communication and explain how it reduced the problem of geographic distance
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!