Answer:
The answer would be B.
Explanation:
A is an example of the manager just telling others what to do instead of getting their input, and C is just not the answer.
Answer:
No, certainly it does not represent a security risk when someone is covering the face in public. It can have different implications. For example, if women is covering her face in public, it could be due to her own choice regarding the religious paradigm. It depends entirely on her how she is interpreting the religion and what she thinks best for her. It can also happen that sometimes covering of the face might be to hide her identity from the public. But if man is covering his face in public, it could be due to save his face from the dust, weather conditions etc but definitely not for the religious sake. In some cases, if man is covering his face, as we see in the movies, it could be for some security risk perspective.
The transfer is a preference that can be avoided.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
When Tricia sells her diamond watch to Dale Kehoe BMW than it is called an “avoidable preference” which means the transfer of payment processed by debtor to a creditor, this is decided by bankruptcy trustee for reimbursement of assets creditors and recover benefit of bankruptcy property.
This is performed for impartially distribution of debtor’s assets to the creditors through proper scheme. In this case, the procedure Tricia opted may benefit Kehoe more than other but through bankruptcy proceeding the trustee would have involved the watch with rest of the property of Tricia and initiated uniform distribution.
The land ordinance of 1785 made it so that the US could survey the land in the Louisiana territory and settlers could buy that land for farming.
I hope it helps!
I think it is C. He offered many programs to the state because he saw the plight of poor farmers. <span />
