Yayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Answer:
Pretty sure the answer is D
Explanation:
I the word draft:
1. draft (noun) - a gust of cool air in a room. An example would be: Please close the window - there's draft in the room!
2. draft (noun) - a rough plan. An example would be: I haven't finished the paper yet - I only have a draft so far.
3. draft (noun) - obligatory military service. An example would be: That country still has a draft - my nephew just joined the army!
4. draft (verb) - to serve in the army. An example would be: My friend has just been drafted - he will have to serve for a year!
II the word break:
1. break (verb) - to separate something into pieces. Example: Why did you break your glasses?
2. break (verb) - disobey law. Example: He broke the law when he killed that man.
3. break (verb) - become publicly known. Example: When the news broke, everybody was surprised.
4. break (noun) - a pause. Example: I've been working for hours - I need to make a break.
III the word present:
1. present (noun) - a gift. Example: When I was in Spain, I bought presents for everyone!
2. present (noun) - the current moment. Example: I prefer living in the present rather than the past!
3. present (adjective) - currently there. Example: Is everyone present in class today?
4. present (verb) - to show. Example: I presented him with a gift, but he wasn't pleased at all.
There are three main leadership styles that are widespread known.
The first one is the "Laissez-Faire Leadership" in which consist of minimal direction and supervision. One disadvantage of this kind of leadership is that the control could get lost by the direction and the response of employees does not meet the expectations of the job or the project.
The second one is the "Autocratic Leadership", which has been traditional across the years. This style consist of a constant supervision, which can cause stress on the employees and lack of creativity and propositivity by the team.
The last one and balanced one is the "Participative Leadership" in which it is intended to be in the middle of the two firts approach, giving to the team the freedom of use their own initiative but having at the same time a guideness and a control on the project. The disadvantage is that the balance is not easy to manage and either the team can get lost on guideliness or the leader can restrict in some way the initiatives of the team and this can lead to demotivation.
Let's try to negotiate a solution for this unseemly behavior
