1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maks197457 [2]
3 years ago
9

How were other countries pulled into the conflict between Serbia and Aust- Hungar?

History
1 answer:
m_a_m_a [10]3 years ago
3 0
Other countries were pulled into what would become the first world war thanks to numerous alliances and treaties. I will do my best to explain it below.

Austria-Hungary (AH) wanted to go to war with Serbia.

Russian did not want this to happen and intended to protect their interests in Serbia.

AH asked Germany to help fight on their side if it came to war, Germany accepted thinking it would not.

AH Sent Serbia a list of 10 demands they could never meet and said that if they didn't meet the demands they would invade, however Serbia replied saying it could meet all demands except for the 6th. AH invaded anyway.
Germany Declared war on Serbia because they had said they would, but they really didn't want to.

Russian Declared mobilized against Germany and AH but assures their friend Germany that they're only mobilizing against AH.

Germany devises the <span>S<span>chlieffen Plan to crush Russia's ally France very quickly and so that it could focus on Russia since Russia should have been slow to mobilize, however it became clear the France had no intentions of joining the war and Russia was mobilizing quicker than intended, so Germany claimed France bombed them and went to war with them anyway.

To circumvent France's heavily fortified boarders, Germany invaded Belgium and planned to use that as a passage way to France. Germany decimated both Belgium and Northern France, however the British Empire was upset that Germany invaded their ally Belgium and as such declared war on Germany.

British Colonies (Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India) were dragged into the fight thanks to technically being </span></span>British.

Germany signs a secret deal with the Ottoman's to bring them into the Central Powers one day after declaring war on Russia.

Germany Declares war on Russia and so do the Ottomans.

Bulgaria, still upset because it lost a war to Serbia in 1913 joins the Central Powers.

Italy, although technically allied with Germany and Austria, decides to declare war on them because it never really liked Germany much anyway.

Japan sees this as an opportunity to take many of the German colonies in Asia, and so declares war on the Central Powers.

The USA remains neutral for most of the war, but towards the end (1917) enters as and independent power that fights alongside the Alliance.

The Russian Revolution (also 1917) begins and so they are forced to withdraw from the war.

Thanks to the British Colonies and America's intervention towards the end, the war swings in the Alliance's favour, Germany, Austria, Bulgaria, and The Ottoman's are defeated. America insists every world power dissolve it's empire, and they comply. Germany has many sanctions placed on them during the treaty of Versailles, everybody pretty much just blames them for the whole thing when it was really Austria's fault, this sets the stage for WW2.

And this right here is a very condensed version of the political scene during WW1
You might be interested in
Which right in the Florida Declaration of Rights is not included in the Bill of Rights?
Likurg_2 [28]
D.Right to work 
hope i helped
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the courts get the power of judicial review?
Rashid [163]
The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury vs. Madison in 1803.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The term “Yellow Journlism” is defined as
xxMikexx [17]

Answer:

D) sensational news stories meant to boost readership

8 0
3 years ago
Which statements about Vladimir Lenin are true? Select all correct answers.
NeTakaya
2 and 3 are the true statements
3 0
3 years ago
OMGGGGG PLZ HELPPPP!!! 60 points!!!
gladu [14]

Answer:

Isaiah 53:4-6 (5)

Explanation: Essay

Jesus said the volume of the book is written of Me. He also, after He was raised from the dead, that evening, He met two men on the road to Emmaus. It was then that the bible tells us that, beginning with Moses and the prophets, He explained to them the things concerning Himself in all the scriptures, Lk 24:27. That excites me! So I have focused my attention on the Old Testament, to find Jesus on every page; and usually as you find Jesus, you also find out God's plan and how it relates to us, the Church.  So I read the first verse in Hosea chapter 6, and I agree that He has healed us and I agree that He has bandaged us, but what does it mean that He has torn us or that He has wounded us? This just didn’t sit right with me. I don’t believe that God beats us up or causes or allows bad things to happen to us to teach us a lesson. Our God is a righteous God. And I understand that there has to be a judgement for sin. Sin cannot go unpunished. This is why Jesus came and paid the price for our sin on the cross. All the judgement and wrath of our sin was placed upon Him, “the chastisement of our peace was upon Him”, Isaiah 53:5. So when I come across a scripture like Hosea 6:1, that alludes to God beating us up, I always take a deeper look and usually find that there is a treasure buried there; as is the case in this verse.  Now with Old Testament events and prophecy, you must always look at it in two ways; the present sense and the foreshadowing implications of the future sense. The events and prophecy of the entire Old Testament was put in place for the one goal- to reconcile man with God. This was the plan before the foundation of the world. Before God even created man, He knew man would sin and He knew He would have to send His Son to us to be the reconciliation for that sin. Everything in the Old Testament points toward Jesus and is His plan for the reconciliation of man with God.  Now, in Hosea 6, Hosea is prophesying over Israel, because Nebuchadnezzar is going to bring Israel into exile, that is the present, practical look at this verse, but I am convinced that everything God does, He does on purpose and can be related as a type or foreshadowing on something yet future. So when the text says He has torn us and He has wounded us it made me pause. If you look at the text in the Septuagint translation, you will find that the word “torn” is a present tense verb in the indicative mood. This means that it is something that happened in the past and continues to have effects up to and including the present time. This Greek word is harpazo, which is the same word for the rapture or the catching away of the saints. Also, when you look closely, you will find that the word “us” isn’t even in the original text. The translators added this, but it really isn’t there. So now this starts to take on a whole new meaning. It wasn’t Israel who was torn away but someone else. Now if you study the word “wounded” this is a future tense verb. The translators wrote this as “has wounded”, but it should have been written “will be wounded” and again the “us” doesn’t even exist. Now let’s read this with this new information.  “Come let us return to the Lord, for He has been snatched away, but He will heal us. He will be wounded and He will bandage us”.  This now makes perfect sense. Hosea is talking about Jesus! Because of man’s sin, God could no longer fellowship with man. Sin was creating a barrier and it was as if God was snatched away from man. But He will heal us. He did this on the cross. From Hosea’s point of view, the cross was still future. We, as Christians look back at the cross and believe it happened. Sin, now, no longer is a barrier between God and man. Jesus was wounded for our transgressions and bruised for our iniquities and because of this He has bandaged us. Repaired and healed us with the Father. Reconciliation between God and man is why Jesus came and died on the cross. Jesus came to heal us. So when Isaiah 53:5 says “by His stripes we were healed”, now I look at this as our reconciliation with the Father. Jesus healed me of my sin and now I can have a personal relationship with Him because the barrier of sin has been removed.  I also believe healing in a physical sense is still available today, but I don’t think physical healing was the main purpose of Isaiah 53 and Hosea 6. Reconciliation with the Father was the main purpose and physical healing is a type and foreshadowing of that healing.  There is absolutely nothing wrong with believing that Jesus has healed our physical bodies. In fact God wants us to be made whole without sickness and disease. Also, there is nothing wrong with believing God for financial stability and the comfort of this physical world. But we have to be careful not to make the healing of our physical bodies and the comfort of this world the ultimate prize. Jesus is the prize and our focus should never turn from Him.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What impact did the Crusades have on European social structure, especially feudalism?
    12·1 answer
  • Where did many prisoners wish to settle
    15·1 answer
  • This term describes the commonly held belief during this age of Imperialism that it is the European and Western Democracies duty
    7·1 answer
  • .
    12·1 answer
  • When did the space age begin?
    5·2 answers
  • What was the major reason that corridos became popular during the Mexican Revolution of 1910?
    15·1 answer
  • Which conditions best describe Andersonville Prison? Check all that apply. It was safe. O It was the least crowded. It had high
    7·2 answers
  • A description of the Anti-federalist
    6·1 answer
  • What makes terrorism different than war between two nations?
    10·2 answers
  • What parts made industrialization possible in the us?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!