A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
Veto is when the government decides not to pass a law.
Answer: The correct answers are 1-increase pluralistic ignorance 2- less likely to assume it's an emergency situation
Explanation:
Pluralistic ignorance is a concept in social psychology that refers to a situation in which a group of people reject certain norms or behavior but go along with it because they feel and assume (Sometimes incorrectly) that other people accept it.
Pluralistic ignorance can explain the By-stander effect that leads people to think "if no one is saying anything or doing anything then I'm not going to say or do anything".
In this particular case, Gillian heard a squeal of brakes and a crash. She looks around and notices that no one was affected by that noise and subsequently she stays calm.
