Answer: The Bill limits the power of the monarchy by creating a separation of powers, therefore enhancing and protecting the rights of citizens.
Explanation:
Answer:
GEORGE VANCOUVER answer C
Explanation:
The argument he presented (which he called the "separation of powers" was about the structure of the government: there should be three branches.The legislative branch made the laws,the executive branch enforced the law,and the judicial branch interpreted the laws.He wanted the structure to be this way so that power would be spread evenly.<span />
Answer:
Plot an open circle at 48 and shade right.
Explanation:
We only use a closed circle for when it is less than/greater than or equal to. Because you have to be taller than 48, we are going to use an open circle. You shade to the right because anything that is bigger than 48 could be an option for h.
True: The Declaration of Independence speaks of a Divine Creator.
True: The Declaration of the Rights of Man speaks of a Supreme Being.
True: Both documents drew on the natural law philosophy of John Locke.
Some additional details about the "Divine Creator" and "Supreme Being" distinction:
The Declaration of Independence (1776) famously asserted, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." America's founding fathers tended to speak in religious terms associated with the Christian tradition, even though a number of them were more like Deists in their own beliefs. Deists believe that there is a God who created the world, but set it up to run by natural laws and did not intervene in a personal way in its operation.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen (1789) was less overt in ascribing the rights of human beings to God as Creator. That declaration of the French Revolution stated, "The National Assembly recognizes and proclaims, in the presence and under the auspices of the Supreme Being, the following rights of man and of the citizen." They were taking using more overtly Deist language, acknowledging a Supreme Being that was the reasonable force governing all things, but seeing human beings in society granting rights according to the actions of a just government.