Answer:
False
Explanation:
The situation above is called the "pitch." This is a <em>process of persuasion </em>whereby people present their ideas to their<u> potential clients or investors.</u> This is done in order to achieve a particular purpose. In the situation above, the ad agency's purpose is<em> to win the potential client's account. </em>In order to become successful in pitching ideas, one has to consider some pointers such as <em>getting to the point fast, using a message map, not using too many slides and the like.</em>
So, this explains the answer.
I believe the answer is wheel network.
In wheel network, only one person has the authority to give all informations to all a members of the company (usually the leaders).
This type of network information has the least chance of misunderstanding the information because the source of information hasn't been passed around from one perceptive to another.
Explanation:
Explanation: The formula is ATC = AFC + AVC. Use this formula. It will be useful for you
The efficient market theory would be violated if investors earned extraordinary returns months after a company announced unexpected profits. Thus, the correct option is (d.) Investors earn abnormal returns months after a firm announces surprise earnings.
<h3>What exactly is the hypothesis of an efficient market?</h3>
The efficient-market hypothesis is a financial economics concept that asserts asset prices represent all available information. Because market prices should only react to fresh information, it is impossible to continually "beat the market" on a risk-adjusted basis.
Because the EMH is expressed in terms of risk adjustment, it can only offer testable predictions when combined with a specific risk model. As a result, financial economics research has focused on market anomalies, or departures from specified risk models, since at least the 1990s.
To learn more about Efficient-market hypothesis, click
brainly.com/question/28529377
#SPJ4
Answer:
From all indications,the two rents received have been posted wrongly, I want to believe that you are required to post the adjusting entries,hence my answer below:
The first $9000 was posted to deferred revenue,whereas only two months should have been
First rent:
DR Deferred revenue $3000
CR Revenue $3000
Second Rent
DR Revenue $6000
CR Deferred revenue $6000
Explanation:
The first $9000 was posted to deferred revenue,whereas only two months should have been deferred and December rent recognized as rent.
As far as the second rent is concerned only one month has been earned,as a result the revenue should be credited with just $3000 for December.
This then mean that revenue from the second property has been overstated in December by $6000,this necessitated by adjustment above.