Answer:
The correct answer is a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Explanation:
Self-fulfilling prophecy in psychology is a perception bias through which we anticipate facts and their consequences before they occur and with overwhelming assurance. It is completely normal that when we live in any situation, we keep a record in our memory and serve as learning for the future. Throughout our lives we encounter situations that are similar to others that we have already lived and react to them based on that previous experience. Human beings build our reality based on experiences.
The problem comes when we make an anticipation or prediction of things without having any logical or realistic basis to reach a conclusion. How many times have we said that "In the end this will happen, you'll see"? And we do it without any real reason that leads us to be sure that it will be so. That's when we are getting carried away by what is called self-fulfilling prophecy or self-fulfilling prophecy.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option C.
Explanation:
- A Cost variance seems to be the gap and difference between the expected expenditures incurred as well as the projected regular expenditures at just the start of such a time frame.
- Such variances have been used by administrators to assess and monitor the progress including its supply chains, expenditures as well as other activities.
⇒ Cost variance = Actual cost - Standard cost
Some other available options have no connection with the given case. So choice C seems to be the perfect solution to that.
Answer:
A. $2,650,000 $3,312,500
B.$532,000 $291,500
C.$10 $10
Explanation:
Before Dividend After Dividend
(a)Stockholders’ equity
Paid-in capital
Common stock, $10 par
$2,650,000 $2,915,000
In excess of par value $106,000
Total paid-in capital
$2,650,000 $3,021,000
Retained earnings
$532,000 $291,500
Total stockholders’ equity
$3,182,000 $3,312,500
(b)Outstanding shares
$265,000 $291,500
(c)Par value per share
$10 $10
10×$26,500=$265,000
$2,650,000+$265,000=$2,915,000
$14×$26,500=$371,000-265,000
=$106,000
$265,000+$26,500=$291,500
A formula helps you understand the problem better!!!
Answer:
The correct answer is dominating.
Explanation:
Generally, different definitions of "social conflict" are offered, differences that call our attention to complementary aspects of the concept: For example, Stephen Robbins: "A process that begins when one party perceives that another has affected it negatively or that It is about to negatively affect some of its interests ”2 and that of Lewis A. Sew for whom the social conflict is a struggle for values and for the status, power and scarce resources, in the course of which opponents want to neutralize, damage or eliminate their rivals. A conflict will be social when it transcends the individual and comes from the structure of society itself.
