Let's rewrite the expression correctly:
(12x3 - 11x2 + 22x - 5) / (4x -1)
Dividing the expression between (4x -1) we have:
3x2 - 2x + 5
We can check the result:
(3x2 - 2x + 5) * (4x-1)
= 12x3 - 8x2 + 20x - 3x2 + 2x - 5
= 12x3 - 11x2 + 22x - 5
Division OK.
Answer:
The result of the division is:
3x2 - 2x + 5
Answer:
Its option C
Step-by-step explanation:
to find the volume you multiply the length, width and height together.
Answer:
The answer would be that this graph is NOT a proportional relationship.
La respuesta sería que este gráfico NO es una relación proporcional.
Step-by-step explanation:
The reason why this graph makes no relationship is because a relationship needs to be constantly equivalent to the past fraction. But would 2 be equal to 5 and 4 be equal to 10? Nope, that is why it is not a proportional relationship.
La razón por la cual este gráfico no tiene relación es porque una relación debe ser constantemente equivalente a la fracción pasada. ¿Pero sería 2 igual a 5 y 4 igual a 10? No, por eso no es una relación proporcional.
