Answer:
From the information given about the contract and its execution between the two parties involved( That is, Parc and Glaze), the option 2 is most likely.
2. Glaze will win because Glaze substantially performed and Parc prevented complete performance.
Explanation:
It is stated that Glaze was hired to remodel and furnish an office suite, after a submitted plans by Glaze were approved by Parc. It was further stated that the construction and painting had been done.
Although, with Glaze purchasing minor accessories which Parc rejected because they did not conform to the plans is a breach of contract, but that can be corrected by calling Glaze to order. However, it was Parc that refused to allow Glaze to make necessary corretion and complete the project and also refused to pay Glaze any part of the contract price.
Database... it organizes info into records
Answer:
C. the actual cost of materials was less than the standard cost.
Explanation:
As it can be seen from the given information that
The Favorable material purchase price is $380
And, non-favorable material quantity variance is $120
So, the total favorable price variance is
= $380 - $120
= $260
This represents that the actual material cost would be lower than the standard cost
hence, the option C is correct
Answer:
c. borrowing on its line of credit.
Explanation:
Line of credit denoted as LOC is a form of borrowing which is known to be a flexible form of taking loans. In this borrowing platform, one can borrow a certain amount of money and still borrow more even without paying the initial dept, this primarily makes it flexible. In giving this loans their a certain factors that aid qualify one in getting access to this loan, and this includes the individual credit score and good usage of his/her online purchasing medium without faulting or breaking codes of conducts.