Answer:
Production budget:
Projected sales= 64,000
Ending inventory= 7,000
Beginning inventory= (2,600)
Total= 68,400 units
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Pasadena Candle Inc. projected sales of 64,000 candles for January. The estimated January 1 inventory is 2,600 units, and the desired January 31 inventory is 7,000 units.
Production budget= projected sales + ending inventory - beginning inventory
Production budget:
Projected sales= 64,000
Ending inventory= 7,000
Beginning inventory= (2,600)
Total= 68,400 units
Answer:
C. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence
Explanation:
Spencer will win the lawsuit and Sally is liable for negligence.
This is because, Sally was the person originally hired to do the roofing job.
She hired other workers to help her with the job, so she's liable to their actions and inactions.
Sally is operating under a working agreement (contract) and has already charged a fee of $10,000 so any punitive damages would be her responsibility.
Spencer was moving around and Glen threw some roofing shingles without any word of warning to people that might be in harm's way. So for Glenn's actions, Sally is liable for his negligence.
Answer:
<h2>In the context of Consumer Theory or Indifference Curve involving two goods,the opportunity of any one good is computed by how much of the other good is foregone or sacrificed to purchase one more unit of that particular good.</h2>
Explanation:
- In this instance,when Bill's diner consumes 35 burgers and 25 hotdogs,its opportunity cost of additional hot dog=
.Therefore,initially Bill diner's opportunity cost of an additional hot dog is 1.4 units of burger.
- Now,when Bill's diner chooses to consume a combination of 25 burgers and 65 hot dogs,its opportunity cost of additional hot dogs=
approximately.Hence,Bill's diner is willing to sacrifice approximately 0.385 units of burger to consume an additional unit of hot dog. - Now,due to the change in consumption combination,the change in opportunity cost of additional hot dog=
units of burger.Notice,that here the opportunity cost of additional hot dog decreased from 1.4 units of burger to 0.385 units of burger as Bill's diner changed the consumption combination of both burgers and hot dogs.
Answer:
Option (B) $5,000
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Repayment of Loan = $50,000
Interest = 8%
Cash flow Probability
$65,000 70%
$45,000 30%
Tax rate = 0%
Now,
Interest on loan = 8% of $50,000
= $4,000
Expected value of cash flow = ∑[cash flow × Probability ]
= ( 0.7 × $65,000 ) + ( 0.3 × $45,000 )
= $45,500 + $13,500
= $59,000
The owner's expected cash flow after debt service
= Expected value of cash flow - Interest on loan - Repayment of Loan
= $59,000 - $4,000 - $50,000
= $5,000
Hence,
Option (B) $5,000
C = 50 + 0.8Y is the consumption function that is consistent with the provided data. The MPC is determined by subtracting the change in consumption from the change in disposable income, which equals 160/200, or 0.8.
Marginal propensity calculation.
$200 billion less $0 billion equals $200 billion in changes to disposable income.
Consumption change equals $210 minus $50, or $160 billion.
MPC = Change in Consumption/Change in Disposable Income, which equals $160 billion/$200 billion and is equal to 0.8.
There is a 0.8 marginal tendency to consume.
Step 2
This is how consumption function is defined.
C = a + bY
Where,
a = Consumption at zero income level
b = MPC
In given case,
$50 billion would be consumed at a level of income zero.
MPC is 0.8
So,
C = 50 + 0.8Y is the consumption function that matches the provided data.
To learn more about consumption function
brainly.com/question/14975005
#SPJ4
