1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nadya68 [22]
3 years ago
11

Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Lorenzo and Neha are playing a game in which both must simultan

eously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Lorenzo chooses Right and Neha chooses Right, Lorenzo will receive a payoff of 6 and Neha will receive a payoff of 5
Neha
Left Right
Lorenzo Left 8,4 4,5
Right 5,4 6,5
1. The only dominant strategy in this game is for (Neha/Lorenzo) to choose (Right/Left)
2. The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Lorenzo chooses (Right/Left) and Neha chooses (Right/Left) .
Business
1 answer:
jok3333 [9.3K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

1. The only dominant strategy in this game is for Neha to choose Right.

2. The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Lorenzo chooses Right and Neha chooses Right.

Explanation:

A dominant strategy is a strategy that results in a player being better off no matter the choice his or her opponent in a game.

For this game, when Lorenzo plays Left, Neha will choose Right because 5 > 4. Also, when Lorenzo plays Right, Neha will still choose Right because 5 > 4. This shows that Neha will always play Right no matter what Lorenzo plays. This implies the dominant strategy for Neha is Right.

On the other hand, when Neha plays Left, Lorenzo will also play Left because 8 > 5. But when Neha plays Right, Lorenzo will choose will also play Right because 6 > 4. This shows that Lorenzo does not have any particular strategy that make him better off. Therefore, Lorenzo does not have a dominant strategy.

Therefore, we have:

1. The only dominant strategy in this game is for (Neha/Lorenzo) to choose (Right/Left)

Based on the analysis above, the only dominant strategy in this game is for Neha to choose Right.

This is because the dominant strategy for Neha is Right, but Lorenzo does not have a dominant strategy.

2. The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Lorenzo chooses (Right/Left) and Neha chooses (Right/Left) .

Based on the analysis above, the outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Lorenzo chooses Right and Neha chooses Right.

The reason is that Neha will always play Right and Lorenzo will be better of by also playing Right because 6 > 4.

You might be interested in
Novak Corporation amended its pension plan on January 1, 2020, and granted $152,280 of prior service costs to its employees. The
m_a_m_a [10]

Answer:

26762.74

Explanation:

Prior service cost amortization for 2020 can be calculated by first calculating the average time until the employee's retirement. After calculating the average time until retirement we will divide the service cost at that time

Workings

average time until retirment  = 1880/330

average time until retirment = 5.69 years

prior service cost amortization for 2020 = $152,280/5.69

prior service cost amortization for 2020 = $26762.74

3 0
3 years ago
This barrier of trade is when trading partners do NO trade with another country:
sukhopar [10]

Answer:

C. Embargo

Explanation:

Trade Barriers are the conditions or restrictions that are imposed on the business transactions that controls the business to be sold out to the hands of foreign markets. These barriers add obstacles so that the businesses are restricted through various means. When a complete ban is imposed on the import or export of any goods to the foreign markets, the situation is termed as embargo. This type of ban is imposed for the defense purposes.

4 0
3 years ago
If you bought a share of common stock, you would probably expect to receive dividends plus an eventual capital gain. Would the d
larisa86 [58]

Answer: Yes, the distribution between the dividend yield and the capital gains yield would influence the firm’s decision to pay more dividends rather than to retain and reinvest more of its earnings.

Explanation:

Yes, If a company decides to increase its dividend payout ratio, the dividend yield component will rise, but the expected long-term capital gains yield will decline as there is less to reinvest in the company. Also, if the company doesn't pay out dividends, there's more to reinvest in the company. Stable and older companies that are not on a growth objective rely on investors that prefer dividends more than share price appreciation. On the other hand, emerging companies, are inclined to share price appreciation to attract investors. Investors understand that all retained earnings are going towards marketing and growth objectives.

6 0
3 years ago
What was a part of the emerging social, political, and economic philosophies that characterized the first hundred days of Frankl
Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

"Try something and if it doesn't work, admit it and try something else."

Explanation:

When I took US Government, my teacher always emphasized that FDR was probably the best American President, and things like this really show why he admired him so much. Can you imagine those words coming out of the mouth of a modern politician?

Many people like to compare President Obama's first term with FDR's first term, but I believe that Obama had it easier. Not because the recession wasn't bad, but because it was fresh and new. President Bush's handling of the crisis was disastrous, but they messed up only for about one year. When FDR took office, the depression had been around for several years, so the negative effects were much greater.

When FDR took office the country was ravaged and nobody was sure that the new policies would work or not, or even what policies they should have implemented. That is why they engaged in a trial and error type of strategy where several options were explored to try to see what could work and what couldn't.

8 0
3 years ago
In many cases, it is reasonable to refer to the ________________ as the price.
Sladkaya [172]

Most time, it is reasonable to refer to the opportunity cost as the price because it entails the benefit of the foregone good or service.

<h3>What is an opportunity cost?</h3>

It refers to a value of what is rejected in order to perform the chosen alternative, that is, the value one have to give up to buy what you want in terms of other goods or services.

Therefore, it is sometimes reasonable to refer to the opportunity cost as the price because it entails the benefit of the foregone good or service.

Read more about opportunity cost

<em>brainly.com/question/1549591</em>

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Elizabeth, an individual taxpayer, has a marginal tax rate on ordinary income of 32% and a tax rate on long-term capital gains o
    11·1 answer
  • An example of an external document that provides reliable information for the auditor is​ a(n) A. purchase order for company pur
    12·1 answer
  • Tyrell Company issued callable bonds with a par value of $24,000. The call option requires Tyrell to pay a call premium of $500
    15·1 answer
  • How do you find the value of a bond, and why do bond prices change
    5·1 answer
  • According to the washington post article the downsides of cheap corn, farmers' 2014 crop revenues were down from prior years, de
    7·1 answer
  • Inventory Valuation under Absorption Costing
    14·1 answer
  • Peppertree Company has two divisions, East and West. Division East manufactures a component that Division West uses. The variabl
    11·1 answer
  • se the information below for Harding Company to answer the question that follow. Harding Company Accounts payable $36,681 Accoun
    12·1 answer
  • 1. Please select each piece of information needed to calculate a real exchange rate.
    10·1 answer
  • if, after reflecting on the nature of leadership you decide that all leaders must treat their followers with respect, then you h
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!