<span>Q1: The ability of an ecosystem to recover from damage.
In the text, it says "the resiliency of the reefs". From this we know that resiliency is a trait that the reefs have. In the next sentence, we see the context clues that define resiliency when it states "reefs bounce back-even flourish." When someone or something bounces back it recovers and returns to it's previous state.
Q2: to inform readers about how the coral reefs are being destroyed AND to convince readers that practices that destroy coral reefs must be stopped.
It is a "Check All That Apply" so more than one answer can be chosen. The passage title is "Save the Coral Reefs" and the selection ends with the sentence "More can be done now to help the coral reefs bounce back". These clues tell the reader that the author's purpose is to save the reefs. In order to do this the author needs to first explain how the reefs are being destroyed. Then convince readers to save the reefs by stopping the practices that destroy them.
Q3: "could help save" and "unsubstantiated risks".
It is important to pay attention to the question here. It is asking for phrases that support safety - not necessarily nutrition. A pixie stick is safe to eat, but not nutritious. The phrase "could help save" supports the idea that it is safe because it is being defined as possibly life and eye-saving. "Unsubstantiated risks" also shows safety because it state that any risks have not been proven and are therefore unfounded. Some of the other phrases such as "more vitamin A" and "more nutritious" support the argument that the food is healthier but are not used to specifically explain how safe it is.</span>
Answer:
After the deaths of Polynices and Eteocles, Jocasta's brother Creon, who before had governed Thebes after the death of Laius and after the exile of Oedipus, became regent for Eteocles' son Laodamas. It was during one of Creon's reigns that Heracles was born in Thebes.
Explanation:
Brainliest plz
The preposition in the sentence is "with".
Please vote Brainliest!
Silvera ^_^
I would say f, it's the only answer that isn't followed by facts and it gives the option of Morten Olsen.
Answer:
You have learned to avoid interference.
Explanation:
Your speech is outlined and you have practiced. You realize that you shift your weight from side to side when speaking. You focus on avoiding the shifting and you are successful. You have learned to avoid interference.
An interference can be defined as any object, barrier or gesture that affects proper communication or dissemination of informations from the speaker to the recipient or listener. An interference in public speaking is classified into three (3) main categories and these are;
1. Internal interference: these are usually caused as a result of fear, stress or nervousness by the speaker.
2. External interference: these are auditory or visual barriers occurring outside the control of the speaker or listener. Examples are loud sound system, buzzing horns of a car, and noises generally.
3. Speaker-generated interference: these are caused by the speaker and they include mental and physiological obstacles.
<em>Hence, in this case scenario, when the speaker focuses on successfully avoiding the shifting of his or her weight from side to side, he or she has learned to avoid interference. </em>
